Open Access

Nanomeniscus-induced delivery of liquid solutions for diverse nanofiber fabrication

  • Sangmin An1, 3,
  • Bongsu Kim1,
  • Soyoung Kwon1,
  • Kunyoung Lee1,
  • Jongwoo Kim1,
  • Heejoon Ahn2 and
  • Wonho Jhe1Email author
Nano Convergence20152:13

DOI: 10.1186/s40580-015-0046-6

Received: 19 November 2014

Accepted: 4 February 2015

Published: 1 July 2015


Nanomaterial-delivery fabrication expects high-potential impacts on nanoscience, technology and industry, but still faces limited applicability mainly due to high-field requirement for liquid delivery, complicated intermediate processes, and narrow ink selectivity. Here, we demonstrates a simple, non-template, non-contact and electric field-free fabrication of diverse nanofibers. The process consists of continuous, meniscus-assisted delivery of liquid solutions through a nanoapertured nozzle in ambient conditions, followed by subsequent evaporation of liquid and aggregation of nanoparticle residues. For example, the carbon-nanotube nanofibers of 500 nm diameter exhibit a high shear modulus of ~1.5 GPa and current density up to 104 A/cm2. The results provide a unique, universal and versatile tool with wide selectivity in both ink and substrate.


Nanofiber Nano-meniscus delivery 3D nanofabrication Field-free Modulus

1 1 Background

Nanomaterial-delivered fabrication [1-7] is a critical step toward realization of molecular architecture/electronics and nano-bio material engineering. Among conventional technologies, it corresponds to the additive nanofabrication method, representing a bottom up approach for nanostructures and nanodevices, which deposits materials onto a substrate. Such additive methods can be classified into two categories: beam-based writing [8,9] and pen-type lithography [10,11]. The direct laser writing is a typical beam-based lithography method and has the advantage of a fast prototyping speed, but it cannot be used to deposit beam-inactive materials. The electron-beam-based and the focused-ion-beam-based lithography allow high-resolution fabrication of various nanomaterials but the required high particle energy and long writing time limit their applications to nanodevice fabrication. On the other hand, the pen-type nanofabrication method such as the dip-pen nanolithography exhibits the advantages of higher throughput and lower energy consumption than the beam-based methods along with previous contributions of nano-dispensing [12-15] and scanning probe lithography methods [16-18]. However, it also suffers from both lack of continuous writing capability and limited ink selectivity. Recently, the meniscus-confined electrodeposition of electrolytes has been developed for fabrication of metallic structures, but its application is restricted to the conducting substrate because it employs the electric field-induced delivery [19].

Therefore, the low energy consumption, broad selectivity in ink and substrate, and continuous writing capability are still technical challenges for a general realization of the existing additive nanofabrication methods. In other words, one has to overcome the practical limitations of conventional methods in fabrication of diverse nanomaterials; for example, narrow ink/substrate selectivity, complex intermediate processes, difficult individual manipulation of nano-objects, non-applicability of microscale ink-jet printing at the nanoscale, and relatively long manufacturing time. As an alternative approach to address these crucial and demanding issues, we introduce a direct and versatile nanofabrication scheme, which combines the field-free nanomaterial-delivery of liquid solutions (inks) followed by mechanical drawing out of a nanoapertured pipette as well as precise distance controllability and sensitivity of dynamic atomic force microscope (AFM). This method represents substantial advances over current technologies because it demonstrates, (i) realization of general nanofabrication of nanofibers (NFs), (ii) electric field-free, continuous delivery of liquid solutions, (iii) non-template fabrication and in situ characterization of the viscoelastic NFs, (iv) demonstration of wide selectivity in ink (nanoparticles, polymer, ionic/bionic molecules and cabon nano-tube (CNT)) and substrate (mica, glass, gold-coated glass, and graphene) and (v) stable and repeatable operation due to low-energy, non-contact control of the nanoaperture, avoiding its mechanical wear or contact damage.

2 2 Methods

Nanomeniscus-induced delivery of liquid solutions for fabrication of the diverse NFs is realized by using a nanopipette combined with quartz tuning fork (QTF)-based AFM [20] which was previous nanofluidic and lithographical results. The pulled glass nanopipette, fabricated by a mechanical puller (P-2000, Sutter Instrument Co.), with controlled aperture diameters of ~100 nm and ~500 nm, serves as a nano-nozzle for drawing of low-volume liquid solutions (Additional file 1: Figure S1). When the nanopipette tip, which is a reservoir filled with various liquids such as nanoparticle, CNT, polystyrene solutions, approaches the substrate within ~2 nm, the capillary-condensed water naturally forms in the nanopipette-substrate gap in ambient conditions [21]. This water nanobridge plays a mediating role of a nanoscale liquid channel through which the liquid solution is continuously delivered at any desired locations, even in the absence of applied electric fields once the nanobridge is connected. As the tip retracts at variable speeds, the nanomaterial solutions inside the pipette continue to be pulled out to produces the diverse NFs, consisting of aggregated nanomaterials with the solution itself evaporated in air. Note that the non-contact mode operation of AFM can be achieved due to the high stiffness of the QTF, which produces the well-defined and well-characterized NF preform, while protecting the tip damage and allowing its repetitive and reliable use.

The phenomenon of nanomaterial delivery and liquid ejection was directly observed by an optical microscope (OM; ×1,000 magnification) positioned under the substrate. A 200 μm-thick glass was used for the substrate and the 20 nm-thick Au electrode was coated on its bottom surface to avoid field-assisted spreading of the liquid solution on the top surface. The detailed fabrication processes of the vertically drawn NFs are described in Additional file 1: Figure S2 and Movie S1 (×12 play speed). Figure 1 shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of two Au NFs produced thereby, having a 100 nm (500 nm) diameter and 5 μm (40 μm) lengths, respectively using Au nanoparticle solution (2 ± 0.2 nm diameter, PBS buffer, 0.01% wt/vol concentration; BBI Solutions Co.). The diameter of the pulled Au NFs is basically determined by the nanopipette’s aperture size, while the length can be easily controlled by vertical retraction movement of the piezoelectric transducer (PZT) that supports the glass substrate. The self-standing 100 nm-thick NF, showing roughly uniform diameter, is severely twisted to an arbitrary shape by illumination of the SEM electron beam during evaporation of the liquid solution (solvent) that exists between the nanoparticles (Figure 1(a)). The 500 nm-thick NF, being intentionally laid down on the horizontal substrate after being cut off by the tip itself, shows the holes and pores that represent traces of the evaporated liquids (Figure 1(b)).
Figure 1

Products of nanomaterial-delivered fabrication. (a) Fabricated Au nanofiber (NF) of 100 nm thick and 5 μm long, which is free standing but twisted due to SEM electron-beam illumination. (b) Fabricated Au NF of 500 nm thick and 40 μm long, laid down horizontally after fabrication, which shows the traces (i.e., holes and pores) left behind after liquid evaporation.

3 3 Results and discussion

3.1 3.1 Characterizations of the fabricated NFs

To investigate the material characteristics of the NFs, we first have investigated the mechanical properties of the NFs by exploring dynamic force spectroscopy in the simple harmonic oscillator model for the dual function of the QTF as a force sensor [22-25]. When the Au NF was formed between the nanopipette tip and the substrate, with its bottom end fixed to the substrate via physical bonding, fast oscillation motion (~32 kHz) by dithering of the QTF tip (Additional file 1: Figure S3). The shear modulus (=stress/strain, G = τ/γ) of the NFs can be measured, where the shear stress and strain are given by τ = F s /A and γ ≈ 3ΔL/L, respectively (A is the circular cross section area of the NF). Notice that the shear force F s is obtained by integration of the QTF sensor’s force-gradient results, lateral displacement ΔL is half of the oscillation amplitude (a) of the QTF, L is defined by stopping position of tip retraction, and factor 3 comes from the cantilever-model approximation. Figure 2(a) shows the results of the fast oscillation experiment for the Au NF with ~15 μm length and ~100 nm diameter. The oscillation frequency of the NF is same as the resonance frequency of the QTF (~32 kHz), and the oscillation amplitude is determined by the stroboscopic OM images (Additional file 1: Figure S4). Figure 2(a)-(i) presents the sinusoidal temporal behaviors of the strain γ (black curve) and stress τ, which shows the existence of a time delay Δt with respect to the strain. For large oscillation (red curve for a ~1.3 μm), Δt is about 5 μs, whereas only a slight delay occurs for small oscillation (blue curve for a ~100 nm), indicating the dependency of viscoelasticity of the NF on the oscillation velocity. Figure 2(b)-(ii) present the elliptic hysteresis curves between the stress and strain, which reveal the time delay, that is, the viscoelasticity information of the NFs. With the measured shear stress of ~8 MPa (20 MPa) at the strain of 2% (5%), we obtain the Au NF’s shear modulus of ~400 MPa at each maximum displacement, which show similar values with the protein crystal (100 ~ 1000 MPa) or soft polymer (~500 MPa) [26].
Figure 2

Characteristics of the fabricated NFs. (a) Results of the fast oscillation (at ~32 kHz frequency) experiment. (i) The time delay Δt of the shear stress τ (blue and red curves) with respect to the strain γ (black curve) for the NF. (ii) The hysteretic responses between the shear stress and strain for a different oscillation amplitude a. (b) Electrical properties of the NF. (i) Electrical current is in situ measured by connecting the fabricated NF with two electrodes after fabrication. The current through the NF shown in (ii) Measured current signal with various current spikes which may be associated with rearrangement of the constituent nanoparticle clusters within the NF by electric field. (c) Optical properties of the NF. (i) The XRD results exhibits the spectral peak associated with the Au (111) particles. (ii) Halogen lamp illumination shows the well and uniformly distributed Au nanoparticles within the NF, as indicated by the gold color.

For investigation of the electrical properties of the NFs, a direct current measurement scheme was implemented on the spot where the NF was fabricated (Additional file 1: Figure S5). After the NF was fabricated on the substrate, the two electrodes were connected with the NF and the electrical current was in situ measured (Figure 2(b)). The NF behaves like a poor conductor (~200 nA at ~1 kV bias potential) compared with the single-crystalline Au nanowire [27] due to the low dimensional factor, impurity and composition of liquid. Interestingly, several electrical spikes were observed as marked by the arrows, which may be attributed to rearrangement of the nanoparticle clusters within the NF by an applied electric field. Due to the physical similarity between the NF and the molecular architecture based on complex biological materials, the similar current measurement may be useful for such applications as molecular electronics and biomolecule synthesis. We also investigated the optical (or structural) properties of the NFs by analyzing the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and by illuminating the halogen lamp (Figure 2(c)). The test sample for the XRD experiment was prepared by a droplet of the 2 nm Au-particle solution dried on the glass substrate, and the XRD results indicate the presence of the Au (111) states above the SiO2 background. Direct illumination of the halogen lamp on the fabricated Au NF shows the gold-color fluorescence, which confirms the uniformly distributed Au nanoparticles along the NF axis.

3.2 3.2 Wide selectivity in ink and substrate

The previously demonstrated nanoscale material-delivery schemes with electrospinning and electrochemical methods [11,12] exhibit intrinsic limitations due to, in particular, narrow ink selectivity associated with stringent requirements of specific liquid solutions, such as low viscosity or slow electroreduction rate. Here, we successfully demonstrated fabrication of the NFs using various inks (or liquid solutions) and substrates (Additional file 1: Figure S6). Figure 3(a) presents the OM images of various NFs produced by diverse combinations of ink and substrate. For example, the 2 nm Au-nanoparticle- and 42 nm polystyrene-sphere-based NFs having a diameter of several hundred nm were fabricated on the glass, Au-coated glass, mica, and chemical vapor-deposition graphene monolayer [28,29] by using a 100 and 300 nm apertured nanopipette. In the case of NaCl solution, on the other hand, the ionic concentration was a critical factor for successful nanofabrication. At a high concentration (>0.1 M), although vertical growth was possible with a shape of the hollow sculpture, it was rather difficult to fabricate the well-shaped NFs due to the fast reduction process of ions. However, at a low concentration under ~10−4 M, the nanoscale NaCl crystal pillars were easily produced by the NF fabrication (Additional file 1: Figure S7).
Figure 3

Wide selectivity in ink and substrate for diverse nanofiber fabrication. (a) The OM images of several NFs produced by different combinations of inks and substrates. (b) The fabricated micro- and nano-scale composite (i.e., mixture of Au nanoparticle and NaCl) NFs, which are distinguished by the contrast of the reflection-mode OM images.

In particular, the ionic composite NFs could be realized by using deionized (DI) water (with a resistivity of ~18 MΩ · cm) at a low pulling speed of the pipette tip (Additional file 1: Figure S8). In other words, the low-concentration ions in DI-water were well stacked and thus formed the NFs on the boundary rim of the nanoaperture, resulting from fast evaporation of water at a low retraction speed of the tip. In particular, this result is worthy of notice because it suggests one can realize nanomaterial-delivered fabrication even with such a high-purity DI-water. The dye molecule-delivered NFs on the glass and mica substrates were also fabricated and their images were captured by the florescence microscope (FM). In addition, Figure 3(b) shows the OM images (in both transmission and reflection modes) of the fabricated micro ((i), (ii)) as well as nanoscale ((iii), (iv)) Au nanoparticles/NaCl composite fibers. Because the NaCl solution tends to aggregate the Au nanoparticles with each other, the NF drawing experiment had to be performed immediately after the solution is filled in the nanopipette reservoir. Each part of NF having different constituent particles (i.e., Au nanoparticle or NaCl) is distinguished by the contrast of the reflection OM image.

3.3 3.3 Electrical wiring by micro/nanoscale CNT fibers

The CNT fibers have high industrial potential due to the unique capabilities of mechanical strength, good electrical and thermal conductivity [30]. Using our proposed nanofabrication technique, the micro/nanoscale CNT fibers were simply fabricated with a commercial single wall CNT solution (1 ~ 2 nm diameter, 2 ~ 5 μm length, 0.1% wt/vol, H2O buffer, KH Chemicals Co.) in ambient conditions. For demonstration of capability of the fiber device, two spatially separated Au electrodes on mica substrate were in situ connected by the fabricated CNT fiber (having diameters of (i) ~500 nm, (ii) 1 μm and (iii) 5 μm). The electrical wiring by the CNT fiber was performed by lateral movement of the NF fabrication procedure (Figure 4(a)). The in situ measured shear modulus of the fabricated 500 nm CNT fiber is ~1.5 GPa, showing no fracture, which is ~4 times higher than the case of Au nanoparticle-delivered NF (Figure 4(b)). The electrical property of the connected ~500 nm diameter CNT fiber is about 2 orders higher than the Au nanoparticle NF case, which is comparable to previously reported results [30,31] (Figure 4(c)). In particular, the middle part of the 5 μm diameter CNT fiber expands by 50 s illumination of electron beam, which occurred during SEM-image taking (Additional file 1: Figure S9A). In the case of small diameter under 50 nm, the CNT fiber is bent by electrons, similarly to the previously shown Au nanoparticle-delivered NF case (Additional file 1: Figure S9B). The vertically grown CNT fiber using our system with ~5 μm aperture diameter of the pipette is presented in Movie S2 (×4 play speed).
Figure 4

In situ electrical wiring with the CNT fiber. (a) Demonstration of CNT fiber device capability with in situ electrical connection between two separated Au electrodes on the mica substrate using the CNT fibers (with diameters of (i) ~500 nm, (ii) 1 μm and (iii) 5 μm) pulled by the proposed NF fabrication procedure. (b) Corresponding mechanical properties. The measured shear modulus is ~1.5 GPa, which is ~4 times higher than the Au nanoparticle-delivered NF case. (c) High electrical property. The measured current density is about 2 orders higher than that of Au nanoparticle NF.

4 4 Conclusion

We demonstrated a general, non-template, non-contact, and electric field-free nanomaterial-delivery platform for fabrication of diverse NFs in ambient conditions. We showed continuous pulling of flexible NFs, accompanied by in situ mechanical interpretation with a wide selectivity in nanomaterials (inks) and substrates for versatile and direct fabrication. We may further extend our method to fabricate thinner NFs down to 30 nm diameter or to design better characteristic NFs for biology-driven purposes. Our nanoscale fiber-pulling results may also help (i) facilitate in situ fabrication and characterization of the low-dimensional viscoelastic biological materials and (ii) build the nanoscale architectures with various inks for electrical/biological/chemical applications as a candidate to realize the practical field-free nano ink-jet printing or to use as a platform for molecular electronics.



This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2009–0083512), Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2013R1A6A3A03063900), and the Brain Korea 21.

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for THz-Bio Application Systems, Institute of Applied Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Natural Science, Seoul National University
Department of Organic and Nano Engineering, Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Hanyang University
Present address; Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology


  1. N Jones, Science in three dimensions: The print revolution. Nature. 487, 22–23 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. BY Ahn, EB Duoss, MJ Motala, X Guo, S-I Park, Y Xiong, J Yoon, RG Nuzzo, JA Rogers, JA Lewis, Omnidirectional printing of flexible, stretchable, and spanning silver microelectrodes. Science. 20, 1590–1593 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. HWP Koops, J Kretz, M Rudolph, M Weber, Constructive three‐dimensional lithography with electron‐beam induced deposition for quantum effect devices. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B11, 2386–2389 (1993)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. J-H Ahn, H-S Kim, KJ Lee, S Jeon, SJ Kang, Y Sun, RG Nuzzo, JA Rogers, Heterogeneous three-dimensional electronics by use of printed semiconductor nanomaterials. Science. 314, 1754–1757 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. S Matsui, T Kaito, J Fujita, M Komuro, K Kanda, Y Haruyama, Three-dimensional nanostructure fabrication by focused-ion-beam chemical vapor deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B18, 3181–3184 (2000)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. D Chanda, K Shigeta, S Gupta, T Cain, A Carlson, A Mihi, AJ Baca, GR Bogart, P Braun, JA Rogers, Large-area flexible 3D optical negative index metamaterial formed by nanotransfer printing. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 402–407 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. M Onses, C Song, L Williamson, E Sutanto, PM Ferreira, AG Alleyne, PF Nealey, H Ahn, JA Rogers, Hierarchical patterns of three-dimensional block-copolymer films formed by electrohydrodynamic jet printing and self-assembly. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 667–675 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. S Jeon, V Malyarchuk, JA Rogers, Fabricating three dimensional nanostructures using two photon lithography in a single exposure step. Opt. Exp. 14, 2300–2308 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. N Anscombe, Direct laser writing. Nat. Photon. 4, 22–23 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. RD Piner, J Zhu, F Xu, SH Hong, CA Mirkin, Dip-pen nanolithography. Science 283, 661–663 (1999)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. D Li, Y Xia, Electrospinning of nanofibers: Reinventing the wheel? Adv. Mater. 16, 1151–1170 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. A Fang, E Dujardin, T Ondarcuhu, Control of Droplet Size in Liquid Nanodispensing. Nano Lett. 6(10), 2368–2374 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. A Bruckbauer, L Ying, AM Rothery, D Zhou, AI Shevchuk, C Abell, YE Korchev, D Klenerman, Writing with DNA and Protein Using a Nanopipet for Controlled Delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124(30), 8810–8811 (2002)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. BM Kim, T Murray, HH Bau, The fabrication of integrated carbon pipes with sub-micron diameters. Nanotechnology 16, 1317–1320 (2005)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. M Schrlau, HH Bau, Carbon-based nanoprobes for cell biology. Micro Nano Fluid. 7(4), 439–450 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. R Garcia, AW Knoll, E Riedo, Advanced scanning probe lithography. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 577–587 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. S Deladi, NR Tas, JW Berenschot, GJM Krijnen, MJ de Boer, JH de Boer, M Peter, MC Elwenspoek, Micromachined fountain pen for atomic force microscope-based nanopatterning. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(22), 5361–5363 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. A Meister, M Liley, J Brugger, R Pugin, H Heinzelmann, Nanodispenser for attoliter volume deposition using atomic force microscopy probes modified by focused-ion-beam milling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(25), 6260–6262 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. J Hu, MF Yu, Meniscus-confined three-dimensional electrodeposition for direct writing of wire bonds. Science 329, 313–316 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. S An, C Stambaugh, G Kim, M Lee, Y Kim, K Lee, W Jhe, Low-volume liquid delivery and nanolithography using a nanopipette combined with a quartz tuning fork-atomic force microscope. Nanoscale 4, 6493–6500 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. H Choe, M-H Hong, Y Seo, K Lee, G Kim, Y Cho, J Ihm, W Jhe, Formation, manipulation, and elasticity measurement of a nanometric column of water molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 187801 (2005)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. FJ Giessibl, Atomic resolution of the silicon (111)-(7x7) surface by atomic force microscopy. Science 267, 68–71 (1995)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. M Lee, J Jahng, K Kim, W Jhe, Quantitative atomic force measurement with a quartz tuning fork. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 023117 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. M Lee, W Jhe, General theory of amplitude-modulation atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036104 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. S An, J Kim, K Lee, B Kim, M Lee, W Jhe, Mechanical properties of the nanoscale molecular cluster of water meniscus by high-precision frequency modulation atomic force spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 053114 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. RG Larson, The structure and rheology of complex fluids (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999)Google Scholar
  27. M Jung, H Noh, Y-J Doh, W Song, Y Chong, M-S Choi, Y Yoo, K Seo, N Kim, B-C Woo, B Kim, J Kim, Superconducting junction of a single-crystalline au nanowire for an ideal josephson device. ACS Nano 5, 2271–2276 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. KS Kim, Y Zhao, H Jang, SY Lee, JM Kim, KS Kim, J-H Ahn, P Kim, J-Y Choi, BH Hong, Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457, 706–710 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. S Bae, H Kim, Y Lee, X Xu, J-S Park, Y Zheng, J Balakrishnan, T Lei, HR Kim, YI Song, Y-J Kim, KS Kim, B Özyilmaz, J-H Ahn, BH Hong, S Iijima, Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 574–578 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. N Behabtu, CC Young, DE Tsentalovich, O Kleinerman, X Wang, AWK Ma, EA Bengio, RF ter Waarbeek, JJ de Jong, RE Hoogerwerf, SB Fairchild, JB Ferguson, B Maruyama, J Kono, Y Talmon, Y Cohen, MJ Otto, M Pasquali, Strong, Light, Multifunctional Fibers of Carbon Nanotubes with Ultrahigh Conductivity. Science 339, 182–185 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. LM Ericson, H Fan, H Peng, VA Davis, W Zhou, J Sulpizio, Y Wang, R Booker, J Vavro, C Guthy, ANG Parra-Vasquez, MJ Kim, S Ramesh, RK Saini, C Kittrell, G Lavin, H Schmidt, WW Adams, WE Billups, M Pasquali, W–F Hwang, RH Hauge, JE Fischer, Macroscopic, Neat, Singl-Walled Carbon Nanotube Fibers. Science 305, 1447–1450 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© An et al.; license Springer. 2015

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.