Skip to main content

Table 1 A brief summary of the representative experimental studies on NRR using various electrocatalytic heterogeneous catalysts

From: Photocatalytic and electrocatalytic approaches towards atmospheric nitrogen reduction to ammonia under ambient conditions

Catalyst

Electrolyte

Condition

NH3 formation rate

Unit

Potential

Reference electrode

Faradaic efficiency

Year

Fe-phthalocyanine

1.0 M KOH

25 °C

7.0E+05

mol s−1 cm−2

− 47.8 mA cm−2

Current density

0.34%

1989 [59]

ZnS

1.0 M KOH

25 °C

7.1E+06

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.1 V

vs RHE

0.964%

1990 [60]

ZnSe

1.0 M KOH

25 °C

8.1E+06

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.1 V

vs RHE

1.29%

1990 [60]

Ti

0.2 M LiClO4/0.18 M ethanol in THF

25 °C

  

2.0 V

Cell Voltage

8.20%

1994 [60]

Cu

0.2 M LiClO4/0.18 M ethanol in THF

25 °C

  

2.0 V

Cell Voltage

5.30%

1994 [61]

Ru/C

2.0 M KOH

20 °C

3.43137E−12

mol s−1 cm−2

− 1.10 V

vs Ag/AgCl

0.28%

2000 [62]

90 °C

4.08497E−12

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.96 V

vs Ag/AgCl

0.92%

2000 [62]

Polyaniline

methanol/LiCiO4/H2SO4

25 °C

0.000,000,014

mol−1 ml−1

− 0.12 V

vs RHE

2.00%

2005 [63]

30 wt % Pt/C

0.50 M H2SO4

RT

1.14E−09

mol s−1 cm−2

1.6 V

Cell Voltage

0.50%

2013 [64]

H+/Li+/NH4+ mixed electrolyte

80 °C

9.37E−10

mol s−1 cm−2

1.2 V

Cell Voltage

0.83%

2013 [65]

Ru/Ti

0.50 M H2SO4

30 °C

1.2E−10

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.15 V

vs NHE

N/A

2014 [66]

Rh/Ti

1.5E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.171 V

Ni wire

0.050 M H2SO4/0.1 M LiCl, EDA

RT

3.58E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

1.8 V

Cell Voltage

17.20%

2016 [58]

Porous Ni

2-propanol/H2SO4

RT

1.54E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

0.5 mA cm−2

Current Density

0.89%

2016 [67]

Mo nanofilm

0.010 M H2SO4

RT

3.09E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.49 V

vs RHE

0.72%(at − 0.29 V vs RHE)

2017 [54]

γ-Fe2O3

0.10 M KOH

65 °C

1.21528E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

0 V

vs RHE

1.96%

2017 [68]

Au nanorods

0.10 M KOH

RT

2.69281E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.2 V

vs RHE

4.00%

2017 [55]

Au/TiO2

0.10 M HCl

RT

3.49673E−10

mol s−1 mg −1cat

− 0.2 V

vs RHE

8.11%

2017 [56]

Au-CeOx/RGO

0.10 M KOH

RT

1.35621E−10

mol s−1 mg −1cat

− 0.2 V

vs RHE

10.10%

2017 [57]

30 wt % Fe2O3-CNT

0.50 M KOH

RT

6.74E−12

mol s−1 cm−2

− 2.0 V

vs Ag/AgCl

0.16%

2017 [69]

PEBCD (poly N-ethyl-benzene-1,2,4,5-tetracarboxylic diimide)/C

0.50 M Li2SO4

25 °C

2.5817E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.5 V

vs RHE

2.85%

2017 [70]

40 °C

7.07516E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.5 V

4.87%

MOF(Fe)(metal–organic-frameworks)

2.0 M KOH

90 °C

2.12E−09

mol s−1 cm−2

1.2 V

Cell Voltage

1.43%

2017 [71]

Fe2O3-CNT

2.0 M NaHCO3

RT

3.59477E−12

mol s−1 cm−2

− 2.0 V

vs Ag/AgCl

0.15%(at − 1.0 V vs Ag/AgCl)

2017 [72]

Fe on stainless steel mesh

Ionic liquid

RT

3.88889E−10

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.8 V

vs NHE

30%

2017 [73]

N-doped carbon

0.05 M H2SO4

RT

3.88889E−16

mol s−1 mg−1

− 0.9 V

vs RHE

1.42%

2018 [32]

Ru nanosheets

0.10 M KOH

RT

3.90196E−10

mol s−1 mg −1cat

− 0.2 V

vs RHE

0.217%

2018 [74]

Mo2N nanorod

0.1 M HCl

25 °C

1.28105E−09

mol s−1 mg −1cat

− 0.3 V

vs RHE

4.50%

2018 [75]

VN nanowire array

0.1 M HCl

25 °C

2.48E−10

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.3 V

vs RHE

3.58%

2018 [76]

Pt

6 M KOH/polymer gel

30 °C

4.049E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

0.5 V

Cell Voltage

0.0108%

2018 [77]

Ir

60 °C

2.763E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

0.25 V

Cell Voltage

0.108%

Bi4V2O11/CeOx

HCl, PH = 1

RT

3.79248E−10

mol s−1 mg −1cat

− 0.2 V

vs RHE

10.16%

2018 [78]

Pore-size-controlled hollow gold nanocatalysts

0.1 M LiOH

RT

6.11111E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.4 V

vs RHE

35.90%

2018 [37]

Hollow gold nanocages

0.5 M LiClO4

RT

6.37255E−11

mol s−1 cm−2 at − 0.5 V

− 0.4 V

vs RHE

30.20%

2018 [79]

MoN Nanosheets

0.1 M HCl

RT

3.01

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.3 V

vs RHE

1.15%

2018 [34]

N-doped carbon nanospikes

0.25 M LiClO4

RT

1.58791E−09

mol s−1 cm−2

− 1.19 V

vs RHE

11.56 ± 0.85%

2018 [36]

Vanadium Nitride Nanoparticles

3 M KOH

RT

3.31E−10

mol s−1 cm−2

 

vs RHE

5.95%

2018 [35]

Chromium Oxynitride nanoparticles

Nafion Solution(5% wt)

RT

8.9E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

2.0 V

Cell Voltage

6.70%

2018 [38]

MoS2

0.1 M Na2SO4

RT

8.08E−11

mol s−1 cm−2

− 0.5 V

vs RHE

1.17%

2018 [33]