Synthetic method | Electrode | Potential | Electrolyte | Product | FE (%) | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pyrolysis | HKUST-1 derived Cu/carbon | − 0.7 V vs. RHE | 1 M KOH | CO | 71 | [67] |
Pyrolysis | ZIF derived Co-N | − 0.68 V vs. RHE | 0.5 M KHCO3 | CO | 94 | [68] |
Pyrolysis | ZIF-8 derived NiSAs/N-C | − 0.89 V vs. RHE | 0.5 M KHCO3 | CO | 72 | [65] |
Pyrolysis | HKUST-1 derived Cu-Cu CN | − 1.07 V vs. RHE | 1 M KOH | C2H4 | 45 | [67] |
Pyrolysis | ZIF derived carbon and CNT | − 0.74 V vs. RHE | 0.1 M NaHCO3 | CO | 97 | [69] |
Hydrothermal/pyrolysis | Ti/TiO2NT-ZIF-8 | + 0.1 V vs. RHE | 0.1 M Na2SO4 | C2H5OH | – | [70] |
Hydrothermal | Cu based HKUST-1 | − 1 V vs. Ag/AgCl | 0.5 M KHCO3 | CH3OH/C2H5OH | 10.3 | [61] |
Hydrothermal | Ru doped HKUST-1 | − 2 V vs. Ag/AgCl | 0.5 M KHCO3 | C2H5OH | 47.2 | [66] |
Pyrolysis | ZIF-8 derived Fe-N sites | − 0.42 V vs. RHE | 1 M KHCO3 | CO | 92 | [64] |