From: Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from biomass conversion
Photocatalyst | Substrate | Power intensity mWcm−2 | Production rates mmol h−1gcat−1 | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pt/TiO2/SiO2 | MeOH/H2O | 100 (AM 1.5G) | 497 | Han et al. 2015 [22] |
Au/TiO2 | MeOH/H2O | – (Solar Simulator) | 1.4–7.0 | Serra et al. 2015 [38] |
Au/TiO2 | EtOH | 100 (Solar Simulator) | 5–6 | Puga et al. 2014 [35] |
CuOx/TiO2 | EtOH | 100 (Solar Simulator equipped with 150 W Xe lamp) | – (4 mg h−1 g−1cat) | Ampelli et al. 2013 [67] |
Fe2O3 | EtOH | – (Solar Simulator) | – (20 mmol h−1 m−2) | Carraro et al. 2014 [68] |
Ag/Fe2O3 | EtOH | – (Solar Simulator) | – (24.0 mmol h−1 m−2) | Carraro et al. 2014 [68] |
Au/Fe2O3 | EtOH | – (Solar Simulator) | – (45.0 mmol h−1 m−2) | Carraro et al. 2014 [68] |
Pt/TiO2-nanotubes | EtOH | – (Low-power solar lamp, 60 W tungsten) | – (37.1 μmol h−1 cm−2) | Ampelli et al. 2010 [69] |
Cu2O/TiO2-nanorods | Glycerol | – (Natural sunlight) | 50.339 | Kumar et al.. 2015 [70] |
TiO2-nanorods | Glycerol | – (Natural sunlight) | 2.95 | Kumar et al. 2015 [70] |
CuO/TiO2-nanotubes | Glycerol | – (Natural sunlight) | 99.823 | Kumar et al. 2013 [71] |
ZnO/ZnS-nanorods | Glycerol | – (500 W Xe) | 0.3884 | Sang et al. 2012 [72] |
Cu2O-microcrystals | Formaldehyde | 50 (Xe > 420 nm) | – (82.2 μmol in 3 h) | Gao et al. 2015 [73] |
Pt@ZnIn2S4/RGO/BiVO4 (Z-scheme) | Formaldehyde | – | 1.687 | Zhu et al. 2019 [74] |
Ir-Bpy-ENT (Iridium-based bipyridine- and ethenyl-incorporated bifunctional organosilica nanotubes) | Formaldehyde | – (Vis > 420 nm) | – (14.9 mL in 5 h) | Zhang et al. 2018 [75] |
Cu/TiO2 | Acetic acid | 100 (AM 1.5 G) | 0.036 | Imizcoz et al. 2019 [76] |
NiS/CdS | Lactic acid (with lignin) | – (300 W Xe \(\ge\) 400 nm) | 1.5124 | Li et al. 2018 [50] |
Pt/Holey carbon nitride-N-acetylethanolamine (HCN-NEA) | Triethanolamine | – (300 W Xe) | 22.043 | Liu et al. 2020 [77] |
Poly(3-hexylthiophene)/g-C3N4 | Ascorbic acid | 334.8 (300 W Xe \(\ge\) 500 nm) | −  (3.045 μmol h−1) | Zhang et al. 2015 [78] |
Poly(3-hexylthiophene)/g-C3N4 | Ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid | 6.3 (300Â W Xe \(\ge\) 420Â nm) | 0.044 | Zhang et al. 2015 [78] |
Poly(3-hexylthiophene)/g-C3N4 | Triethanolamine | 6.3 (300 W Xe \(\ge\) 500 nm) | − (0.104 μmol h−1) | Zhang et al. 2015 [78] |
Pt/C3N4-TiO2 | Triethanolamine | – (250 W visible light source) | 1.042 | Alcudia-Ramos et al. 2020 [79] |
Mn-MOF@Au | Triethylamine | – (2.02 W white LED) | 0.6 | Luo et al. 2018 [80] |