Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison of CO/CZO based glucose sensors with ZnO, CoO and their heterostructure either with a metal or a metal-oxide reported previously

From: A dual-functional flexible sensor based on defects-free Co-doped ZnO nanorods decorated with CoO clusters towards pH and glucose monitoring of fruit juices and human fluids

Sample

Linear range (mM)

Sensitivity (µA mM−1 cm−2)

The detection limit (µM)

Response time (s)

References

CO/CZO

0.04 –8.85

4565

0.15

 ~ 4

This study

5% Co-doped ZnO

0.04–8.85

3864

0.30

–

This study

Bare ZnO

0.0

2565

0.33

 ~ 10

This study

ZnO/CC

0.001–1.45

4792

0.43

3

[93]

CuO-ZnO

Upto 8.45

2961

0.4

–

[94]

ZnO nanocombs

0.02–4.5

1533

20

–

[95]

Au-ZnO NRs

0.001–15

4416

0.12

 < 2

[96]

ZnO nanorods

0.6–1.4

1091

0.22

–

[97]

Porous ZnO-CuO hierarchical nanocomposites/FTO

0.00047–1.60

3066

0.21

1.2

[98]

Co3O4 nanosheets

Up to 0.31

12,970

0.058

 < 10

[99]

ZnO–CoO/rGO

0.01–11.20

168.7

1.3

–

[100]

Co3O4/ZnO p–n junction

0.01–5

116.64

1.38

2

[101]