Recent trends in vanadium-based SCR catalysts for NOx reduction in industrial applications: stationary sources

Nano Convergence

Table 3 Comparison of different types of vanadium-based SCR catalysts

Main catalyst	Co-catalyst	Support	Content of V (wt%)	Content of co-catalyst (wt%)	Activity temperature window ( °C)	Refs.
V	–	TiO₂	2	–	200–300	[81]
	–	TiO₂/SiO₂	0.1	–	420–500	[87]
	–	AC(activated carbon)	1 ~ 5	–	200 ~ 400	[82,83,84]
	–	CNT	2.35	–	100–250	[85]
	–	carbon-coated monoliths	5	–	120–250	[86]
	–	CeO₂	0.75	–	250–350	[44]
	W	TiO₂	1 ~ 5	5, 6.5, 8	200–450	[19, 45, 46]
	W	ZrO₂	3	20	250–500	[47]
	W	CeO₂-TiO₂	1	10	250–475	[48]
	Mo	TiO₂	1.5 ~ 3	1, 6	250–400	[49, 53]
	W, Mo	TiO₂	2.5	6 ~ 9	200 ~ 450	[50, 51]
	W or Ba	TiO₂	2	-	250–450	[52]
	W, Mo, Zr, Sn	AC(activated carbon)	5	3 ~ 5	150–250	[59]
	W, Ce	TiO₂	0.2	5	220–400	[56]
	Ce	TiO₂	0.5	5	300–450	[57]
	Ce	Ti-Zr	3	–	210–450	[58]
	Sb	CeO₂-TiO₂	2	2 ~ 10	250–450	[62, 63]
	Sb	CeO₂	4	2	200–400	[64]
	Fe, Mn, Cu, Cr	mesoporous carbon-coated monoliths	3	1	150–200	[65]
	Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Sr, La, and Ce	TiO₂	1	2	250–550	[66]
	Mn, Cu, Sb, La, Mo, Ce	TiO₂	1	3 ~ 7	300–450	[67]
	Sm, La, Ce	Al₂O₃	10	10	–	[68]
	La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Er	TiO₂-WO₃-SiO₂(TWS)	1.9	4.6–5	250–400	[69]
Ce-V		TiO₂-WO₃-SiO₂(TWS)	1.5	WO₃ 9 SiO₂ 10	300–500	[69]
Fe0.2Er0.8VO₄		TiO₂-WO₃-SiO₂(TWS)	8	TWS(81:9:10)	250–450	[70, 71]
CeVO₄ nanorod	Zr	–	19	2 ~ 50	200–400	[60]