Surface force analysis of glycine adsorption on different crystal surfaces of titanium dioxide (TiO2)
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 10 September 2017
Accepted: 1 November 2017
Published: 8 December 2017
Surface force analysis with atomic force microscope (AFM) in which a single amino acid residue was mounted on the tip apex of AFM probe was carried out for the first time at the molecular level on titanium dioxide (TiO2) as a representative mineral surface for prebiotic chemical evolution reactions. The force analyses on surfaces with three different crystal orientations revealed that the TiO2 (110) surface has unique characteristics for adsorbing glycine molecules showing different features compared to those on TiO2 (001) and (100). To examine this difference, we investigated thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) and the interaction between the PEG cross-linker and the three TiO2 surfaces. Our data suggest that the different single crystal surfaces would provide different chemical evolution field for amino acid molecules.
Many organic molecules are chemically or physically adsorbed to mineral surfaces in aqueous solutions. The extent of adsorption is dependent on variables including mineral type, surface roughness, type of adsorbed organic molecule, and the nature of the solvent with respect to properties such as pH, ionic strength, temperature, and the concentration of dissolved ions, which may act as mediators for binding [1, 2]. Among all mineral surfaces, titanium dioxide (TiO2) is well known for its ability to adsorb biomolecules. Understanding the interaction of biomolecules with TiO2 surfaces is important for many areas of modern technology, including photocatalysis, dye-sensitized solar cells, and biological implants used in dental and orthopedic applications [3, 4]. Regarding research on origins of life, the surfaces of this mineral have long been studied as possible catalysts for small organic compound reactions and considered as a host inorganic catalyst in prebiotic evolution studies. Moreover, rutile TiO2 is one of the minerals that have been discovered as micro- or nanoparticles in pre-solar dust grains (also known as interplanetary dust particles) and is included in the “mineral evolution” hypothesis, which outlines 10 stages of near-surface mineral diversification since the formation of the Earth . However, not much is known about how TiO2 surfaces interact with biomolecules at the molecular level. Understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the adhesion of biomolecules on TiO2 surfaces is essential to the identification and improvement of materials suitable for medical applications. Therefore, spectroscopic analyses are required for assessing these mechanisms.
Previous theoretical studies of the interaction of amino acids with TiO2 surfaces, which were based on the density functional theory (DFT), have contributed to understanding the main adsorption modes and are used as prototypes to study protein-surface interactions. Recently, Sowmiya and Senthilkumar used first-principle calculations to determine that anatase TiO2 crystals with more (001) facets adsorb proline, hydroxyproline, and glycine, i.e., major components of the collagen protein. According to their results, amino acids strongly bind to the anatase TiO2 (001) surface in the dissociative adsorption configuration mainly because of the covalent interaction between the oxygen atoms of the amino acid and the titanium atoms on the mineral’s surface . Tillotson et al. used DFT calculations to study how small organic molecules interact with the TiO2 (110) surface. According to their calculations, glycine strongly binds to the Ti5f ion either via the amino (–NH2) or the carboxyl group (–COOH). However, the most stable binding mode for glycine occurred via the interaction of the two oxygen atoms of the carboxylic group oxygen with two Ti5f sites. The proposed reaction involves the transfer of a proton to the surface forming a hydroxyl group and is likely to also apply to larger molecules containing the COOH group . Moreover, the DFT calculations of Tonner demonstrated a probable tilting stabilization effect between the surface-bound hydrogen atom and the nitrogen atom of the amino group, suggesting that van der Waals interactions stabilize the tilted configurations even further by reinforcing the attraction between the amino group and the surface .
Besides these theoretical studies, lots of experimental investigations have also been performed. Examples of these studies include the proline adsorption on TiO2 (110) and (011) single crystal surfaces that was demonstrated by synchrotron-based X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and temperature programmed desorption (TPD) [9–11], and the adsorption of glycine on TiO2 (110) single crystals that was detected by synchrotron-based ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy (UPS) [12, 13], scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) , and plane-wave DFT calculations .
However, as far as we know, there are no force studies of the adsorption of amino acids on the TiO2 surface at the molecular level. Therefore, we decided to study the adsorption of glycine, which is the amino acid with the simplest structure, on TiO2 surfaces by performing AFM force measurements.
1.1 Surface structures of TiO2 (110), (100), and (001) for surface force analysis
TiO2 is typically thought of as being chemically inert and as the most active photocatalyst found in nature, using the energy of light to promote chemical reactions. Importantly, TiO2 is an active catalyst for carbon–carbon bond formation reactions in which higher-molecular-weight compounds are synthesized from smaller ones .
TiO2 crystallizes in three major different structures: rutile (tetragonal, a = b = 4.584 Å, c = 2.958 Å), anatase (tetragonal, a = b = 3.782 Å, c = 9.514 Å), and brookite (rhombohedrical, a = 5.436 Å, b = 9.166 Å, c = 5.135 Å) .
On the (001) surface, all Ti atoms are fourfold-coordinated and all O atoms twofold-coordinated. Hence, it has been proposed that the number of broken bonds on this surface is higher than on the other low-index rutile surfaces discussed so far. Consequently, the (001) surface has a high surface energy and tends to facet or reconstruct. This surface is the least studied with respect to structural information .
The rutile TiO2 (100) surface has received considerably less attention than the (110) crystal face. Some research groups have conducted several theoretical calculations for this crystal surface. In general, all these calculations and theoretical approaches agree that Ti atoms are fivefold-coordinated on the (100) face.
Perron et al. carried out calculations on the different crystal structures of rutile TiO2 surfaces and computed rutile phases, structures, relaxations, and surface energies of the (110), (100), (101), and (001) faces. They found the (110) face to be the most stable one, followed by (100) and (101) [18, 19]. Additional theoretical and experimental work aimed at resolving the geometry of this surface would be quite valuable.
2 Experimental procedures
2.1 Sample preparations (TiO2 substrates)
The (110), (100), and (001) TiO2 surfaces were used to study the interactions with glycine. Commercially available rutile TiO2 substrates of all crystal planes were bought from Shinkosha (Tokyo, Japan).
New substrates were not cleaned by any further treatment and were directly used for AFM measurements. Used substrates were cleaned with deionized water and ethanol in ultrasonication to remove any contaminants from their surface.
2.2 Attaching glycine molecule to the AFM cantilever tip
Glycine (NH2CH2COOH) molecules were anchored on an AFM tip apex to study the interactions of this amino acid with TiO2 (110), (100), and (001) surfaces. This linear molecule consists of three groups and two configurations are possible, as it is neutral in gas and zwitterionic in solid phases.
Moreover, glycine is the smallest of the amino acids. It is ambivalent, meaning that it can be inside or outside of the protein molecule. In aqueous solution and at, or near, neutral pH, glycine exists predominantly in the zwitterion form.
With a well-established tip-modification method as previously reported , glycine molecules were introduced to the AFM tips. Commercial soft cantilevers (OMCL-TR400 PB-1, with both sides gold-coated) with nominal spring constants of 0.02 N/m were used. Cantilevers were cleaned in UV ozone cleaner and followed by washing with ethanol and deionized water to be ready for the further modification steps. The cantilevers were first introduced in a mixture of two types of thiol reagents in ethanol (2 mM 1,8-octanedithiol and 20 mM 6-mercapto-1-hexanol). Mixed solutions were used to increase the probability of single-molecule events by controlling the densities of molecules on the tips as well as to prevent aggregation on the tip surfaces. The cantilevers were inserted into the solution for more than 18 h to introduce the thiol groups. The modified cantilevers with thiol groups were washed with ethanol. MAL-PEG-NHS cross-linker molecules were anchored to the tips by stable covalent bonds formed during the reaction of their maleimide ends with the –SH groups of alkanethiols. The thiol activated cantilevers were incubated for 60 min with 1 mg/ml of NHS-PEG-MAL in toluene. They were then washed several times with PBS to remove unreacted crosslinkers. Finally, glycine residues were cross-linked to the tips through the free NHS ends of the PEG cross-linker molecules by inserting the cantilevers into the solution for 2 h.
3.1 AFM force measurements
In the single-molecule force spectroscopy measurements, several hundred force–distance (F–D) curves were recorded with at least two glycine-modified AFM tips at room temperature in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution (pH 7.4) to minimize the nonspecific interactions between the probe and the substrate. By lowering each modified AFM tip onto the measured surface to a maximum load of 400 pN at a loading rate of 6 nN/s, typical F–D curves were obtained from the contact between each tip and the three different crystal faces of TiO2 surfaces.
A histogram was constructed for the number of adhesion events recorded on TiO2 (110) surface (total number of events: n ≈ 60) versus rupture force and was used to obtain the most probable force (MPF), which was 128.31 ± 38.88 pN (Fig. 2b). Only the rupture events that occurred when the PEG linkers were extended by ~ 10 to ~ 20 nm are shown in the given histograms.
The histogram was built by collecting the appropriate force curves (total number of events: n ≈ 60) and the Gaussian fit indicated an MPF of 96.24 ± 34.22 pN (Fig. 3b). Only those rupture events that occurred when the PEG linkers were extended by ~ 10 to ~ 20 nm are shown in the histogram.
3.2 Thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) measurements
TDS measurements were also carried out on mica and pyrite for comparison with TiO2 (Fig. 5b). The maximum desorption temperature for the glycine monomer (m/z 30) was 200 °C for TiO2 and around 150 °C for mica and pyrite. Importantly, TiO2 also displayed desorption peaks at m/z 71 and m/z 114, corresponding to glycine dimers with a maximum at 245 °C. The fact that, among the three kinds of surfaces, polymerization of glycine was only observed on TiO2, suggests that TiO2 plays an important role in the polymerization reaction of glycine.
Overall, the TDS results revealed the factors because of which glycine interacts more strongly with TiO2 compared to the other minerals. Interaction is mainly categorized into two types: physical and chemical adsorption. Physical adsorption is weak and results from van der Waals forces or electrical interactions. Chemical adsorption is strong as electron exchange takes place between the adsorbed molecule and the surface, resulting in the formation of bonds (covalent, ionic, metal, or coordinate). These results were in agreement with the force measurements in which glycine showed specific interaction with TiO2 but not pyrite or mica surfaces.
4.1 Difference in force curves
4.2 Possible interaction between the PEG linker and TiO2 surfaces
Force measurements did not reveal any specific interaction of PEG-modified tips with TiO2 (100) and (001) surfaces. Measurements on the TiO2 (100) surface were dominated by force curves displaying no interaction (Fig. 7b), while some curves showing non-specific interaction were also observed. When we changed the substrate to TiO2 (001), only force curves showing non-specific interactions caused by electrostatic forces were obtained (Fig. 7c).
The average plateau length observed in this experiment was around 20 nm, which corresponds to a considerable extension of the PEG molecule. However, we cannot be certain whether one or multiple polymer chains are involved in this plateau feature. Plateau force curves in AFM studies have no clear interpretation, thus it is difficult to conclude whether we are dealing with a single polymer chain interaction. In rare occasions, force curves displaying some overstretching and step-like plateaus were obtained. These steps represent the desorption of individual molecules of different lengths. Such weak long-range attraction indicates that some kind of contact is maintained over distances exceeding the standard length of the PEG molecule.
Most importantly, this plateau feature was only detected when measuring the TiO2 (110) surface, implying that it has unique features of adsorption towards glycine molecules compared to TiO2 (001) and (100) surfaces. Our force measurement result was indeed correlated with the difference that was observed between the force curves of glycine on different TiO2 surfaces.
As a reference, we performed force measurements on the TiO2 surfaces using tips that had only undergone the first step of modification (i.e., they had only been modified with the thiol mixture). Only force curves showing molecular aggregation or non-specific interactions due to van der Waals attraction forces were obtained. This proves that the plateau force of interaction indeed originated from the molecules on the tip and the substrate.
4.3 Glycine adsorption mode on TiO2 (110) surface
There are plenty of previous studies about glycine adsorption on TiO2 crystals. Most of them used theoretical approaches to determine the binding model of glycine on TiO2. According to literature based on DFT molecular dynamics simulations, glycine is adsorbed on TiO2 via its zwitterion form, preferentially via deprotonation of the carboxyl group, and forms a (2 × 1) overlayer . Ojamäe et al. suggested a binding model in which the adsorbate binds to surface titan atoms through its carboxylic end (by the formation of an oxygen bridge) and to a surface oxygen ion through its ammonium end (by an H–bond).
In this model, hydrogen bonding via the amine group leads to the further stabilization of the adsorption. They conclude that even though the bridge and monodentate modes are highly favorable, all of these binding modes can contribute to the glycine adsorption on the TiO2 (110) surface. The bidentate modes, where the two oxygen atoms in the carboxylic group attach directly to the fivefold-coordinated Ti sites at the surface, are analogous to the most favorable adsorption mode of formic acid described above. Glycine can also form hydrogen bonds with the surface via the amino group, providing additional stability and leading to a tilting of the molecule with respect to its “vertical” configuration .
Moreover, Hazen et al. reported that the TiO2 (110) surface consists of steps at the atomic scale. The remarkably uniform pattern of steps has an orientation that provides under-coordinated Ti atoms to adsorb amino acids. They strongly suggested that amino acids attach at these steps on the (110) surfaces of rutile. It is known that, in all crystals, steps present special bonding environments for adsorbing molecules.
In this work, we studied the interaction between glycine and three different TiO2 crystal surfaces for the first time at the molecular level using AFM force techniques. The adsorption of glycine on TiO2 was observed by AFM force analysis in which all three crystals [TiO2 (110), (001), and (100)] used in this study showed specific interactions with the glycine-modified AFM tips, whereas no adhesion was observed on pyrite. The surface force results were in good agreement with the TDS measurements in which glycine showed a desorption peak on the TiO2 surfaces, whereas no desorption was observed on mica and pyrite.
The difference in adsorption on the TiO2 surfaces was attributed to the shape of force curves on the TiO2 (110) surface. The adhesion forces and the shapes of the force curves on TiO2 (001) and (100) surfaces were similar. However, the TiO2 (110) surface showed a different feature of adhesion in both the AFM force results as well as in the TDS measurements. We assume that the PEG cross-linker may interact with the TiO2 (110) surface before the glycine adsorption. Therefore, the crystal orientation of TiO2 may influence the amino acid adsorption pathway; however, how the surface structure of this crystal attaches the organic molecules is still under investigation.
As outlined in the introduction, the biomolecule adsorption on TiO2 surfaces is also studied for use in many technological and medical applications. In origins of life studies, a fundamental level of understanding of the role of minerals in chemical evolution can be achieved by studying how molecules interact with TiO2 surfaces in a way similar to that applied to other candidate catalysts. Our results may contribute to the chemical evolution studies by adding to the knowledge of how biomolecules interact with the TiO2 surface, which is considered as one of the host inorganic catalysts in prebiotic evolution studies. Moreover, knowledge of these interactions might also facilitate the use of TiO2 in biotechnological applications.
NG carried out the AFM studies and draft manuscript writing. KI assisted the crystal plane dependence by TDS. TY and MH supervised the research. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Hadean Bioscience”, Grant Number JP26106003.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- W. Stumm, Chemistry of the solid-water interface: processes at the mineral-water and particle-water interface in natural systems (Wiley, New York, 1992)Google Scholar
- D.A. Sverjensky, C.M. Jonsson et al., Glutamate surface speciation on amorphous titanium dioxide and hydrous ferric oxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(16), 6034–6039 (2008)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- T.L. Thompson, J.T. Yates, Surface science studies of the photoactivation of TiO2–new photochemical processes. Chem. Rev. 106, 4428–4453 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- A.G. Thomas, K.L. Syres, Adsorption of organic molecules on rutile TiO2 and anatase TiO2 single crystal surfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41(11), 4207–4217 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- James H. Cleaves II, Andrea Michalkova Scott et al., Mineral–organic interfacial processes: potential roles in the origins of life. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5502–5525 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- M. Sowmiya, K. Senthilkumar, Adsorption of proline, hydroxyproline and glycine on anatase (001) surface: a first-principle study. Theor. Chem. Acc. 135, 12 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- M. Tillotson, P. Brett, et al. Adsorption of organic molecules at the TiO2 (110) surface: the effect of van der Waals interactions. Surf. Sci. 632, 142–153 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- R. Tonner, Adsorption of proline and glycine on the TiO2 (110) surface: a density functional theory study. Chem Phys Chem. 11, 1053–1061 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- G.J. Fleming, H. Idriss, Probing the reaction pathways of DL-Proline on TiO2 (001) single crystal surfaces. Langmuir 20(18), 7540–7546 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- G.J. Fleming, K. Adib et al., The adsorption and reactions of the amino acid proline on rutile TiO2 (110) surfaces. Surf. Sci. 602(12), 2029–2038 (2008)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- G.J. Fleming, K. Adib et al., Proline adsorption on TiO2 (110) single crystal surface: a study by high resolution photoelectron spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 601(24), 5726–5731 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- E. Soria, I. Colera et al., A study of photon-induced processes with adsorption-desorption of glycine at the TiO2 (110)(1 × 2) surface. Surf. Sci. 451(1–3), 188–196 (2000)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- E. Soria, E. Roman et al., Observations with synchrotron radiation (20-120 eV) of the TiO2 (110)-glycine interface. Surf. Sci. 433, 543–548 (1999)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- T.Z. Qiu, M.A. Barteau, STM study of glycine on TiO2 (110) single crystal surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 303(1), 229–235 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- L. Ojamae, C. Aulin, IR and quantum-chemical studies of carboxylic acid and glycine adsorption on rutile TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 296(1), 71–78 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- U. Diebold, The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf. Sci. Rep. 48, 53–229 (2003)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- L. Ojamäe et al., IR and quantum-chemical studies of carboxylic acid and glycine adsorption on rutile TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 296, 71–78 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kenneth J.T. Livi, Bernhard Schaffer et al., Atomic-scale surface roughness of rutile and implications for organic molecule adsorption. Langmuir 29, 6876–6883 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- H. Perron, C. Domain et al., Optimisation of accurate rutile TiO2 (110), (100), (101) and (001) surface models from periodic DFT calculations. Theor. Chem. Acc. 117, 565–574 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- N. Ganbaatar, N. Matsuzaki, Y. Nakazawa, R. Afrin, M. Aono, T. Yano, T. Hayashi, M. Hara, Surface force analysis of pyrite (FeS2): its reactivity to amino acid adsorption. Adv. Mater. Phys Chem. 6, 167–176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2016.67018 View ArticleGoogle Scholar