Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Recent developments of nano-structured materials as the catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction

Nano Convergence20185:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-018-0144-3

Received: 16 March 2018

Accepted: 19 April 2018

Published: 30 April 2018

Abstract

Developments of high efficient materials for electrocatalyst are significant topics of numerous researches since a few decades. Recent global interests related with energy conversion and storage lead to the expansion of efforts to find cost-effective catalysts that can substitute conventional catalytic materials. Especially, in the field of fuel cell, novel materials for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) have been noticed to overcome disadvantages of conventional platinum-based catalysts. Various approaching methods have been attempted to achieve low cost and high electrochemical activity comparable with Pt-based catalysts, including reducing Pt consumption by the formation of hybrid materials, Pt-based alloys, and not-Pt metal or carbon based materials. To enhance catalytic performance and stability, numerous methods such as structural modifications and complex formations with other functional materials are proposed, and they are basically based on well-defined and well-ordered catalytic active sites by exquisite control at nanoscale. In this review, we highlight the development of nano-structured catalytic materials for ORR based on recent findings, and discuss about an outlook for the direction of future researches.

Keywords

ElectrocatalystNano-structured materialOxygen reduction reactionPt alloysNon-Pt catalyst

1 Background

According to the change of global demands to green energy as the substitute of fossil fuel, electrocatalysts with high efficiency have been received great attentions to various researchers in the field of renewable energy [13]. Especially, oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) was crucial issue in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell, because slow kinetics of cathodic reaction related with oxygen reduction limits overall system efficiency. PEM fuel cell has been regarded as the most promising energy system for the environmental friendly vehicles, resulted from high energy density and fast refueling. As a result, several commercial PEM fuel cell vehicles were launched by global automobile makers, but development of electrocatalyst with high efficiency and low cost was remained as the ongoing task for the market expansion. Platinum (Pt) and Pt-based materials were mainly utilized in the fuel cell as the catalysts due to the fact that they were considered as the most effective electrocatalysts for ORR [4, 5], but high cost of Pt and low durability of support materials such as carbon particle prevent the practical commercialization [6]. The platinum contents of commercial Pt/C catalyst were ranged from 10 to 60 wt%, and loading amount of Pt was about 0.4 ~ 0.8 mgpt/cm2. The set target of the Department of Energy (DOE) is 0.125 mgpt/cm2 for the practical commercialization until 2020, and researches for reducing Pt consumption have been attempted. Also, there was another problem in addition to high cost and catalytic performance, and it was long-term stability. Pt-based catalysts have the problems related with Pt dissolution and corrosion of carbon support due to the acidic operating condition. Therefore, development of cost-effective electrocatalyst for fuel cell was governed by maximizing mass and specific activities, and minimizing Pt usage with high stability.

Various researches have been attempted to improve those problems above mentioned. Common research directions were reduction of Pt consumption in electrochemical cell, even though there were a lot of approaching methods to achieve high cost-efficiency and durability. Increasing surface area by reducing the size of Pt particle was the most simple and effective method to minimize Pt consumption, because catalytic reaction is operated in the surface of catalyst, however size controlling to the scale of a few nanometers has the practical limitation caused by the severe aggregation due to the high surface energy of nanoparticles. To synthesize Pt nanoparticle without aggregation, site-specific synthetic methods in the template were attempted in several research groups [7, 8]. Graphene as the template for the Pt nanoparticle has the planar structure with sp2-bonded carbon atoms, and it has excellent conductivity and stability, resulted in the widely applications to energy conversion system including fuel cell.

Electrodes of fuel cell were usually formed with complex composed of catalysts and supporting materials for preventing aggregation and maximizing surface area, and carbon black has been utilized as supporting materials due to its high conductivity and porosity. But, this materials could be easily corroded in the acidic working condition, resulted in fast degradation of cell performance. So, there have been various efforts to develop alternating materials with high durability for fuel cell, such as TiO2, SiC, and CeO2 [911]. Another method to reduce Pt consumption was to enhance the performance of electrocatalyst, and results by the formation of alloy using Pt and other metals showed different activity according to the facets and bonding structure [1214]. For example, octahedral PtxNi1−x alloy showed excellent performance than conventional Pt/C catalysts alloy that Ni atoms were segregated in (111) facets [15].

In addition, numerous approaching methods based on Pt-free catalyst have been attempted to develop cost-effective materials [1619]. Though several materials showed possibilities to applications as the catalysts in terms of catalytic performance, serious problems such as catalytic activity and durability should be improved for practical commercialization [19].

In this review, we investigate and discuss about the electrocatalysts with high cost-efficiency and durability for fuel cell based on recent findings, and highlight important results. Also, we will conclude this review by arranging current challenging and future perspective for the catalysts of fuel cell.

2 Downsizing Pt nanoparticle

2.1 Pt/graphene oxide (GO) nanocomplex

Among the methods for increasing efficiency of platinum catalysts, the method to increase surface area was the most efficient way. It has been shown that reducing the size of the particles to the nanometer greatly enhanced the performance of the catalysts. However, effective supporting materials were needed because increasing the surface area of platinum particles will have an aggregation effect between platinum molecules [2023].

Graphene is a 0.34 nm single layer structure and is suitable as a supporting material of platinum because of its properties such as excellent thermal, electrical conductivity, high electron transfer rate, and excellent chemical resistance [2429]. Graphene effectively prevents the aggregation of platinum by allowing it to be placed between pores in the increased surface area for the efficiency of the catalyst. Also, graphene is used as a supporting material because it is active in acidic and alkaline solutions better than carbon black and also has long-term stability [30, 31]. Figure 1 showed representative synthetic process of Pt/GO hybrid sheet. Pre-treated GO sheets have numerous functional groups on the surfaces such as –O, –OH, and –COOH, and they could provide stable site for the synthesis of Pt nanoparticles. Nano-sized Pt particle could be located on the graphene sheet with well-dispersed shape, and that complex showed enhanced catalytic performance [32], compared with Pt/multi-wall carbon nanotube that was considered as an excellent promising catalytic materials for fuel cell [33, 34]. Wu et al. reported another method for the synthesis of Pt–GO hybrid materials based on substitution of sacrificial materials [30]. MnOx/GO nanocomplex produced by laser ablation in liquids were reacted with PtCl62−, and Pt/GO complex could be easily synthesized by the substitution of MnOx to Pt atoms. As a result, they demonstrated a better performance based on fabricated nanocomplex than conventional Pt/C electrocatalyst as shown in Fig. 2. Also, several researches based on graphene such as GO modified Pt nanoflower [35], Pt nanoparticle on defective graphene [36], and sandwich-structured graphene/Pt/graphene [7] have been researched to reduce Pt consumption.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Fabrication process of Pt/GO hybrid sheet, (1) oxidation of graphite powder to GO, (2) formation of Pt/GO hybrid sheet

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [32] Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier)

Figure 2
Fig. 2

CV curve of fabricated Pt/rGO and conventional Pt/C in a 0.5 M N2-saturated H2SO4, b 0.5 M H2SO4 + 0.5 M CH3OH, and c 0.5 M KOH + 0.5 M CH3OH. d 0.5 M H2SO4 + 0.5 M CH3OH

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [30] Copyright @ 2015 American Chemical Society)

2.2 Pt/GO/CB nanocomplex

During fabrication process of Pt/GO nanocomplex, the graphene sheet combined with Pt nanoparticle has a tendency to be layered horizontally, resulted in the formation of stacked catalyst layer. This tendency is a fatal disadvantage to the performance of the electrode including reducing active area of Pt and high diffusion resistance to the reactants in operation process [37, 38]. Carbon black (CB) as a supporting materials can be an alternative to relieve stacking effects due to the high electrical conductivity and increase of a surface area (Fig. 3). Spherical CB is added between layer of graphene sheets to prevent stacking effects and the electrical activity of CB helps the final catalytic performance. The effects of graphene and carbon black result in reducing platinum usage, since they can improve the performance of the catalyst and power output, and provide high utilization of platinum. The highest current produced when the catalyst was synthesized at a ratio of GO and CB with a rate of 75:25, and comparing the efficiency of platinum in H00 (Pt/CB), H100 (Pt/GO), and H75 (Pt/GO/CB) showed that H75 has the highest efficiency as the 2.58 KW/g Pt. When the catalyst is synthesized at a ratio of H75, the amount of platinum consumption could be effectively reduced [39].
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Fabrication process and structure of Pt/GO/CB hybrid support

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [39] Copyright @ 2017 Elsevier)

2.3 Pt/GO/TiO2 nanocomplex

In case of CB support, it is difficult to secure long-term durability as a catalyst for fuel cells due to the corrosivity of CB in acidic working condition. As described above, it is necessary to add supporting materials between graphene sheets for mitigating the stacking effect. Various alternating materials have been researched to overcome the limitation of CB [911, 40, 41]. Especially, metal oxides such as titanium oxide may become substitutes for carbon black due to low price and inherent characteristics related with high stability in working condition of fuel cell [42, 43]. Though the electrical activity of the titanium oxide is lower than the carbon black, it is similar to the power output of the conventional catalysts because of the electrical activity with graphene. The result using titanium oxide showed stability enhancement of 15% (Fig. 4) in comparison with Pt/rGO catalyst and the increase of its power output by 55%. This could be caused by strong interaction between metal and supporting materials, and synergetic effect between TiO2 and graphene [44].
Figure 4
Fig. 4

a TEM image of Pt/graphene/TiO2 catalyst, b single DMFC performance of Pt/graphene and Pt/graphene/TiO2 catalyst

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [44] Copyright @ 2015 Elsevier)

2.4 Pt/carbon nanotube nanocomplex

Another way to replace the carbon black and reduction of Pt consumption is to apply carbon nanotubes (CNT) to the catalyst formation. CNT has the properties of excellent corrosion resistance, electronic conductivity and specific surface area [45, 46], and can prevent the aggregation of platinum, resulting in enhancement of catalytic activity [4, 47]. Also, long-term durability mentioned by the demerit of CB was crucial point to overcome for the commercialization of fuel cell. Lee et al. have reported Pt/CNT catalyst with improved durability for PEM fuel cell [48]. As shown in Fig. 5a, the high initial current was monitored in Pt/C commercial catalyst, but the total current was decreased after acceleration test, and that meant low durability of commercial Pt/C electro-catalyst. However, initial current in case of Pt/CNT catalyst was changed a little after test in Fig. 5b–d. Activity loss about 62.5% was monitored in Pt/C, but only 6.2% variation was occurred in Pt/CNT catalyst. Also, polarization resistance of Pt/CNT was increased only 3%, in contrast with 700% of Pt/C catalyst. Li et al. have reported size-differences between Pt nanoparticles fabricated on GO and multi-wall CNT [32]. Average Pt sizes of Pt/GO and Pt/MWCNT were 2.75 and 3.5 nm, respectively, and it meant that GO was more suitable template material to reduce the size of Pt nanoparticle, in spite of several advantages of CNT.
Figure 5
Fig. 5

CV measurements of MEAs before and after acceleration test a Pt/C, b Pt/CNT-A, c Pt/CNT-R, d comparison of capacitances

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [48] Copyright @ 2012 Elsevier)

3 Pt-based alloys

Pt-alloys with late transition metals have been firstly researched from the early 1980s, and various results reported that alloys with Ni and Co have the higher activities than Pt-based catalyst in terms of ORR [49], but low stabilities of those researches related with the dissolution during operation process were ongoing research topics. Recently, numerous attempts to synthesize Pt-alloys using rare earth and early transition metals have been operated by the theoretical simulation and specific experimental results. In 2009, Greeley et al. proposed calculated data named volcano plot for predicting activities of Pt-based alloy materials [50], and this plot showed reliable correlation with recent reported findings [51]. Reported researches have showed meaningful cost-effective performances, but suitable methods for practical commercialization such as simple mass production were still remained ongoing researches. Wu et al. reported effective synthetic method for Pt-metal (Co, Fe, Ni, Pd) alloys [52]. Four kinds of Pt–M alloys were synthesized with same process, and shapes were controlled as cubic and octahedral structure to form well-defined morphologies because they usually play key roles in catalytic reactions (Fig. 6). Also, the ORR mass activities of fabricated octahedral Pt3Ni catalyst achieved 0.44 A/mgpt, and it was higher result than conventional Pt/C catalysts.
Figure 6
Fig. 6

Schematic description of shape controlled synthesizing process. Pt-metal alloys were fabricated by gas reducing agent in liquid solution (GRAILS) method

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [52] Copyright @ 2011 American Chemical Society)

3.1 Pt–Ni alloys

Intermediates species such as O, OH, OOH molecules could be easily adsorbed into the platinum surface in the operation process of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and it leads to decrease total active sites for oxygen adsorption, resulted in decline of ORR activities. Platinum and oxygen molecules have mixed potential through the formation of oxide, and the formed oxide prevents ORR [53, 54]. Oxygen molecules in the surface may be adsorbed by secondary transition metals such as Fe, Cu, and Ni in the alloy with platinum [55]. Platinum has high binding energy between oxygen molecules and the surface. The D-band center of the platinum surface has a higher Fermi level than the alloy catalyst. When the alloys are combined, electron transfer takes place from the metal to platinum, resulting in a larger D-band and lower Fermi level [56, 57]. Also, when those alloys were combined with carbon support such as carbon black, graphene and carbon nanotubes, catalyst performance could be enhanced by synergetic effects. Figure 7 indicated ORR activities according to the change of supporting materials as Vulcan XC-72 (CB), graphene, and CNT. Among three results, the catalysts using graphene support showed the highest value, but its stability was lower than other two cases [58].
Figure 7
Fig. 7

a ORR activities of Pt–Ni/VXC, Pt–Ni/CNT, and Pt–Ni/graphene catalysts in O2 saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 with a scan rate of 5 mV/s at room temperature, b mass and c specific activities of three catalysts at 0.8 V in a 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [58] Copyright @ 2016 Elsevier)

Chen et al. developed Pt3–Ni bimetallic nanocrystals for electrocatalyst [59], and it showed 5.7 A/mgpt in mass activity. This nanostructure has the special open-framework with crystalline Pt–Ni alloy (111), resulting in high stability, more active than commercial Pt/C catalysts, even after 10,000 rounds of voltage cycles. Also, in 2015, Huang et al. reported novel Pt–Ni octahedral alloy catalyst supported by carbon with transition metals [60]. Overall structure were represented as M–Pt3Ni/C, where M is applied with vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, molybdenum tungsten, or rhenium. Among them, Mo–Pt3Ni/C recorded the best ORR performances which were a specific activity of 10.3 mA/cm2 and a mass activity of 6.98 A/mgPt, respectively, in contrast of the values of commercial Pt/C catalysts (0.127 mA/cm2 and 0.096 A/mgPt).

3.2 Pt–Cu alloys

Platinum and copper alloy were also used as catalysts for fuel cell because they have benefits to generate high current in comparison with Pt/C catalysts. Because copper was highly active in the oxidation of the intermediate carbon, Pt–Cu alloy has been considered as promising candidate for the cost-effective catalysts [61]. Various methods based on hydrothermal process have been reported to fabricate Pt–Cu alloys [62, 63], and those methods usually required additional process to make porous Pt-rich structure by removing pre-combined Cu atoms. Yang et al. reported fabrication method based on simple electrodeposition method [64]. They have developed hierarchical Pt–Cu/reduced GO catalyst by one-step fabrication process, in which high electrocatalytic activity of 2.3 times (vs. commercial Pt/C catalyst) and robust durability was achieved. Normally, morphological control using supporting materials with large surface area have been used to enlarge active sites of catalysts. Graphene oxide has not only excellent properties as the supporting materials, but also its numerous functional group in the surface can provide binding site with catalyst nanoparticle. However, natural tendency of graphene to stack horizontally resulted in the decrease of catalytic sites as described above. Fabrication of hierarchical structure using GO could be desirable method to enhance catalytic activities by facilitating transfer ratio and increasing accessibility [65, 66], in addition to other methods based on supporting materials such as carbon black or metal oxide [39, 44]. Results about electrochemical activities according to the species of catalysts complex in Fig. 8a indicated the effects of alloying metal and graphene support [67]. Strong responses corresponding to adsorption and desorption of hydrogen were monitored in all CV curves, but Pt–Cu/RGO catalysts showed the highest value in all cases. Also, normalized values based on Pt loading (mass activities) and electrochemical active surface areas (specific activities) were represented in Fig. 8b, in which Pt–Cu/RGO catalysts showed remarkable catalytic activity compared to Pt/RGO and Pt/C catalysts.
Figure 8
Fig. 8

a Cyclic voltammograms of Pt/C, Pt/RGO, and Pt–Cu/RGO catalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4 at a scan rate of 50 mV/s. b Specific and mass activities of the Pt/C, Pt. RGO, and Pt–Cu/RGO catalysts modified GC electrode at 0.62 V

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [67] Copyright @ 2013 Elsevier)

3.3 Catalysts based on Pt-based alloys

Besides Pt alloys with Ni and Cu as described above, several researches based on other metals or structural changes have been attempted to achieve low cost and high durability [68, 69]. Zhao et al. reported octahedral core–shell nanocrystals composed of Pd and Pt–Ni, and fabricated nanocrystal achieved 5 times higher mass activities than commercial Pt/C catalysts [70]. Also, another research group developed core–shell tetrapod structures composed of Pd and Pt [71]. This nanostructure with dendritic morphology showed remarkable activity and durability as the 13% loss of initial electrochemical surface area in comparison with the 78% loss that of Pt/C catalyst. In addition to those researches, various researches based on structural control with several non-Pt materials have been attempted including Pd–Pt nanostructure with the shape of cube as shown in Fig. 9 [72], ternary Pt–Pd–Cu sphere [73], dendritic Pt–Ni–P alloy [74], multimetallic nancube [75], dealloyed Pt–Cox [76], core–shell Ni/Fe–Pt [77], octahedral Pt2–Cu–Ni [78], and Pt-coated Co nanowire [79]. Even though remarkable scientific results in terms of high activity and stability have been reported from various research groups, the ultimate research direction for fuel cell catalyst should be non-Pt based catalysts, because those results above mentioned were based on the catalytic performance of platinum with high cost.
Figure 9
Fig. 9

a TEM image of Pd–Pt nanocube catalyst, b comparison of the RDE results for the ORR (ν = 10 mV/s, ω = 1900 rpm)

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [72] Copyright @ 2015 Elsevier)

4 Non-Pt catalysts

The penetration of ethanol through polymeric membranes (alcohol crossover phenomenon) could interfere with ORR rate. Also, the combination of oxygen atoms to catalysts is so strong that very slow ORR occurs at the cathode. Pt-based catalysts have been mainly utilized in the practical fuel cells to solve these problems. However, numerous researches to apply non-Pt catalytic materials have been conducted at the same time to overcome disadvantages of Pt-based catalysts such as high price and low stability [8085].

4.1 Pd-based catalysts

Among the different types of non-platinum catalyst, palladium nanoparticles have high resistance to crossover and excellent ORR performance. The face-centered cubic (fcc) of the palladium has the same atomic size and electrical properties with Pt. Furthermore, the price of Pd is very low than Pt because of abundant deposit [86, 87]. However, Pd has low stability in acidic condition and high temperature than Pt, it should be synthesized with various transition metals and supports to secure stabilities [88, 89]. Especially, Pd–Ni/C catalyst has been considered promising candidate due to the low price, non-toxic, and high ORR response [90].

Recently, Sanij et al. reported fabrication of Pd–Ni/C with superior catalytic performance [91]. Figure 10a, b indicated size differences of Pt/C and Pt8Ni2/C nanoparticles, and the latter has relatively smaller than the former as 3.6 and 5.5 nm, respectively. Electrochemical activities according to the atomic ratio between Pd and Ni were shown in Fig. 10c, d, in which Pd8–Ni2/C has the highest activity in all catalysts in addition that Pd–Ni/C catalysts were basically higher than Pd/C. Also, hydrogen adsorption/desorption peaks were observed between − 0.2 and 0.02. As a result, the separation of hydrogen could be restricted by adding Ni to Pd atoms. Those phenomena related with performance improvement of mass and specific activities were caused by synergetic effects between Ni and Pd, nanoscale particle size, and carbon support materials [92, 93]. As a result, Pd–Ni/C has showed high possibilities than other catalysts in terms of activity, resistance to methanol, ORR efficiency, and stability [91].
Figure 10
Fig. 10

a TEM images of Pd/C, b Pd–Ni/C, c CV curves of the Pd/C, Ni/C, and Pd–Ni/C catalysts according to the atomic ratio in 0.5 M H2SO4, d mass and specific activities of fabricated various electro-catalysts at 0.1 V

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [91] Copyright @ 2018 Elsevier)

Also, several Pd-based alloy materials with transition metal such as Co and Fe have been researched in various research groups. Tang et al. have developed Pd–Fe/C electrocatalyst and reported the effect of Fe state [94], and Zhang et al. reported results related with the effect of heat treatment to control Pd–Co nanoparticle size which could affect ORR activity [95]. Co atoms combined with Pd could aid to enhance corrosion resistance and durability of the catalyst [96]. Figure 11a showed high stability of Pd–Co/C electrocatalyst, in contrast with considerable differences between BOT and EOT of Pd/C. Compared to the stability of the Pd catalyst, the Pd–Co catalyst was much more stable than that of the Pd. Also, the Pd catalyst has a good property than the commercial catalyst in transmitting methanol, it is more advantageous in terms of cost reduction and increase of energy density as an alternation materials of Pt-based catalysts. Pd–Fe–Mo/C synthesized with the ratio of 7.5:1.5:1.0 at 500 °C showed high activity and durability compared with commercial Pt-based and non-Pt catalysts as shown in Fig. 11b [97].
Figure 11
Fig. 11

a Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) current densities of Pt, Pd, and Pd–Fe–Mo catalysts. b Current density of Pd/C, Pd–Co/C at 0.3 V in chronoamperometry measurements at BOT and EOT

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [96, 97] Copyright @ 2018, 2016 Elsevier)

4.2 Various catalysts based on non-Pt materials

Besides Pd-based catalysts above mentioned, numerous researches using non-Pt materials have been developed to achieve efficient novel electro-catalysts with low cost [17, 19, 98100]. Titanate has been investigated to apply catalyst for fuel cell because of its low price and stability. However, it has low conductivity and poor performance compared with commercial catalyst, so it should be made into catalysts with other materials [101, 102]. Carbon nanostructure with larger surface area are often used for catalyst synthesis due to their electrical and structural characteristics [103]. As a result of complex formation, the property of titanate composite as the catalyst could be reinforced in terms of surface area, structural stability, and lifespan. Mohamed et al. reported catalytic performance of Ag/titanate and Ag/titanate-SWCNT [104]. As a non-platinum catalyst, the titanate compound showed high stability, current generation and corrosion resistance. It was due to the fact that the catalytic function of Ag could be improved by the interaction between Ag and titanate and the Ag particle size was reduced by synthesis process with titanate. Also, the electrode catalyst performance was enhanced by uniform distribution (Fig. 12).
Figure 12
Fig. 12

The change in conductivity values of Ag/titanate/SWCNT, titanate, and titanate/SWCNT at 500 Hz, and 1 kHz

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [104] Copyright @ 2016 Elsevier)

Among various non-Pt based catalysts, the most promising material was transition metal/nitrogen supported with carbon (M/N/C, M=Co, Fe, Ni) catalysts, and they have been researched constantly after the Jasinski’s findings about co-phtalocyanine in 1964 [105]. The disadvantages of those materials in comparison with commercial Pt/C catalysts could be divided with three points of volumetric activity, mass transport ratio, and durability. The volumetric activities of M/N/C catalysts were merely 1/10 that of Pt–C catalysts in spite of recent progress [17, 106, 107], but this level could be sufficient to apply those materials to operate fuel cell, because the increase of input to electrode for retaining total activity was technically feasible. However, M/N/C structure has low mass transfer characteristics so that practical applications were restricted due to the insufficient power density. Proietti et al. achieved high power density using Fe-based catalysts [19], in which fabricated Fe/Phen/Z8 catalyst showed the power density comparable with the results of commercial Pt/C catalyst that loaded with 0.3 mgpt/cm2 as shown in Fig. 13. Also, improved long-term stability was achieved as only 15% degradation after operation test, though further researches required to provide sufficient performance for commercial applications. In 2016, novel results has been reported by Sa et al. [108]. As shown in Fig. 14, they proposed fabrication method based on silica-protective-layer for maximizing Fe–Nx active sites in catalysts. Iro prorphyrin precursor was adsorbed into CNT, then these complex were coated with silica layer. This coating was important step for preserving active sites during synthesis process. The coated layer was removed by etching, resulting in the formation of Fe–N/C catalysts which consisted of porphyrin carbon with FeNx sites supported with CNT. Fabricated catalyst showed very high ORR activity and stability in alkaline media, and it achieved volumetric current density of 320 A/cm3 in acidic media that exceeds DOE target of 300 A/cm3 in 2020.
Figure 13
Fig. 13

Polarization and power density curves of MEAs using NRE 211 membranes (Fe/Phen/Z8: blue, previous most active Fe-based catalyst: red, commercial Pt-based catalyst: green). a Polarization curves for MEAs, b power density curves corresponding to polarization curves in a

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [19] Copyright @ 2011 Macmillan Publishers Ltd: [Nature Communication])

Figure 14
Fig. 14

Fabrication process of Fe/PC/CNT with maximizing FeNx active sites

(reprinted with permission from Ref. [108] 2016 American Chemical Society)

Encapsulated non-Pt metal based catalysts (ENPMC) have been considered as promising materials for fuel cell due to the advantages according to the protection of metal active sites with outer carbon layer [109112]. The structure consisting of metal core and carbon shell by encapsulation process was typical concept for preserving active sites of metal. For example, Deng et al. reported Fe encapsulated pot-like CNT catalyst in 2013 [110], and fabricated materials showed low activities than M/N/C type catalysts, but remarkable enhancement of stability could be achieved. After operation test for 200 h, its activity was preserved similarly with initial value, and this result was caused by structural characteristics of encapsulated metal. Those kinds of materials have structural disadvantage related with access of reactant because active metal sites were not exposed in the catalyst surface, and further studies required to compliment low ORR activities. Recently, encapsulated Fe-based catalyst with high activity was proposed by Strickland et al. [99]. This complex was based on metal–organic-framework (MOF) as the template and FePhen organic precursor. This FePhen@MOF has well-ordered encapsulated structure with 2 nm thin film, and it showed high activity than commercial Pt/C catalyst in alkaline media and similar activity in acidic media.

Metal-free materials such as doped carbon were also important candidates to substitute commercial Pt-based catalysts. Basically, carbon-based materials did not have activity for ORR, but they have gained broad attentions from the result of Gong et al. in 2009 [113] that nitrogen doped CNT without metal exhibited high electrocatalytic activity and long-term stability. They first reported N-doped CNT as the promising candidates for metal-free electrocatalysts, and various research groups have been attempted to develop cost-effective metal-free catalysts based on similar structural concepts [114116]. Recently, graphene has been noticed as promising materials to various applications resulted from high stability and surface area, and it has been applied to fabricate metal-free electrocatalysts [117, 118], in which novel materials with higher activities in comparison with N-doped CNT was reported that showed comparable activities with commercial Pt/C catalysts [119].

5 Summary and future challenges

Development of novel electrocatalysts with low cost and high activity as an alternation of expensive Pt-based catalyst has been one of the most important topics in the field of PEMFC. In this review, we have highlighted recent findings based on the fabrication of nano-structured materials. Nanocomplexes composed of carbon-based materials and Pt showed high activity and long-term stability in comparison with commercial Pt/C catalysts, even though total amount of Pt loading was decreased. Also, Pt alloys exhibited synergetic effect that each disadvantage of Pt and non-Pt materials as a catalytic materials for fuel cell was counterbalanced by the formation of alloy. Non-Pt based catalysts have been considered as the most promising materials to replace conventional catalysts, recent findings showed possibility to practical commercial applications such as Fe–N/C, FePhen@MOF, and N-doped CNT. In spite of new findings above mentioned, carbon supported Pt nanoparticles are unique catalysts that can be utilized in fuel cell. Recent advances related with structural optimization of Pt-based catalyst showed potentials to solve cost problem, but there is obvious limitation in terms of market expansion. The desirable solution would be non-Pt based materials that have exhibited sufficient performance in recent results, but improvement of long-term stability is required for the commercial applications.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SK, HK and YHC wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP; Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) (No. NRF-2017R1C1B5017625), and by the Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) Granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea (No. 20164030300260).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemical Engineering, Hoseo University, Asan, Republic of Korea

References

  1. G. Wu, K.L. More, C.M. Johnston, P. Zelenay, High-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction derived from polyaniline, iron, and cobalt. Science 332, 443 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. C.W.B. Bezerra, L. Zhang, K. Lee, H. Liu, A.L.B. Marques, E.P. Marques, H. Wang, J. Zhang, A review of Fe–N/C and Co–N/C catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta 53, 4937 (2008)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. M.Z. Jacobson, W.G. Colella, D.M. Golden, Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. Science 308, 1901–1905 (2005)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. M.K. Min, J.H. Cho, K.W. Cho, H. Kim, Particle size and alloying effects of Pt-based alloy catalysts for fuel cell applications. Electrochim. Acta 45, 4211 (2000)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. J.K. Nørskov, J. Rossmeisl, A. Logadottir, L. Lindqvist, J.R. Kitchin, T. Bligaard, H. Jónsson, Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Wang, H.L. Xin, R. Hovden, H. Wang, Y. Yu, D.A. Muller, F.J. Disalvo, H.D. Abruna, Structurally ordered intermetallic platinum–cobalt core–shell nanoparticles with enhanced activity and stability as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Mater. 12, 81 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Zhao, Z.B. Wang, J.L. Li, J.J. Zhang, X.L. Sui, L.M. Zhang, A newly-designed sandwich-structured graphene–Pt–graphene catalyst with improved electrocatalytic performance for fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 5313–5320 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. F.H. Li, Y.Q. Guo, Y. Liu, J. Yan, W. Wang, J.P. Gao, Excellent electrocatalytic performance of pt nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets prepared by a direct redox reaction between Na2PtCl4 and graphene oxide. Carbon 67, 617–626 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Tian, G.S. Wu, A.C. Chen, Unique electrochemical catalytic behavior of Pt nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 nanotubes. ACS. Catal. 2, 425–432 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. H.F. Lv, S.C. Mu, N.C. Cheng, M. Pan, Nano-silicon carbide supported catalysts for PEM fuel cells with high electrochemical stability and improved performance by addition of carbon. Appl. Catal. B 100, 190–196 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. T. Yu, J. Zeng, B. Lim, Y.N. Xia, Aqueous-phase synthesis of Pt/Ce2O hybrid nanostructures and their catalytic properties. Adv. Mater. 22, 5188–5192 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Jayasayee, J.A. Rob Van Veen, T.G. Manivasagam, S. Celebi, E.J. Hensen, F.A. De Bruijn, Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity and durability of carbon supprted PtM (Co, Ni, Cu) alloys: influence of particle size and non-noble metals. Appl. Catal. B 111–112, 515–526 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Todoroki, T. Kato, T. Hayashi, S. Takahashi, T. Wadayama, Pt–Ni nanoparticle-stacking thin film: highly active electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS. Catal. 5, 2209–2212 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Markovic, H. Gasteiger, P.N. Ross, Kinetics of oxygen reduction on Pt (hkl) electrodes: implications for the crystallite size effect with supported Pt electrocatalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1591–1597 (1997)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. C. Cui, L. Gan, M. Heggen, S. Rudi, P. Strasser, Compositional segregation in shaped Pt alloy nanoparticles and their structural behaviour during electrocatalysis. Nat. Mater. 12, 765–771 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. R.Z. Yang, K. Stevens, A. Bonakdarpour, J.R. Dahn, Dependence of the activity of sputtered Co–C–N oxygen reduction electrocatalysts on heat-treatment temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, B893–B901 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Lefevre, E. Proietti, F. Jaouen, J.P. Dodelet, Iron-based catalysts with improved oxygen reduction activity in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Science 324, 71 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. P.H. Matter, E. Wang, M. Arias, E.J. Biddinger, U.S. Ozkan, Oxygen reduction activity and surface properties of nanostructured nitrogen-containing carbon. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 264, 73 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. E. Proietti, F. Jaouen, M. Lefevre, N. Larouche, J. Tian, J. Herranz, J.P. Dodelet, Iron-based cathode catalyst with enhanced power density in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 2, 416 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Serov, C. Kwak, Review of non-platinum anode catalysts for DMFC and PEMFC application. Appl. Catal. B 90, 313–320 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. L. Gu, L. Qian, Y. Lei, Y.Y. Wang, J. Li, H.Y. Yuan, D. Xiao, Microwave-assisted synthesis of nanosphere-like NiCo2O4 consisting of porous nanosheets and its application in electro-catalytic oxidation of methanol. J. Power Sources 261, 317–323 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. K.W. Kim, S.M. Kim, S.H. Choi, J.W. Kim, I.S. Lee, Electroless Pt deposition on Mn3O4 nanoparticles via the galvanic replacement process: electrocatalytic nanocomposite with enhanced performance for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano 6, 5122–5129 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Y.N. Tang, Z.X. Yang, X.Q. Dai, A theoretical simulation on the catalytic oxidation of CO on Pt/graphene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 16566–16572 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. A.K. Geim, K.S. Novoselov, The rise of grapheme. Nat. Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. H.S. Oh, J.H. Lee, H.S. Kim, Electrochemical carbon corrosion in high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 10844–10849 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Y. Xin, J. Liu, X. Jie, W. Liu, F. Liu, Y. Yin, J. Gu, Z. Zou, Preparation and electrochemical characterization of nitrogen doped grapheme by microwave as supporting materials for fuel cell catalysts. Electrochim. Acta 60, 354–358 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Y. Xin, J. Liu, Y. Zhou, W. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Xie, Y. Yin, Z. Zou, Preparation and characterization of Pt supported on grapheme with enhanced electrocatalytic activity in fuel cell. J. Power Sources 196, 1012–1018 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. E.J. Yoo, T. Okata, T. Akita, M. Kohyama, J. Nakamura, I. Honma, Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of Pt subnanoclusters on graphene nanosheet surface. Int. Nano Lett. 9, 2255–2259 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. T.K. Lee, H.J. Park, M.K. Kwon, J.H. Jung, J.B. Kim, S.H. Hur, Fabrication of magnetite/silica/titania core-shell nanoparticles. J. Nano Mater. 2012, 1–6 (2012)Google Scholar
  30. S. Wu, J. Liu, Z. Tian, Y. Cai, Y. Ye, Q. Yuan, C. Liang, Highly dispersed ultrafine Pt nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets: in situ sacrificial template synthesis and superior electrocatalytic performance for methanol oxidation. ACS. Appl. Mater. Int. 7, 22935–22940 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. J.H. Jung, H.J. Park, J.B. Kim, S.H. Hur, Highly durable Pt/grapheme oxide and Pt/C hybrid catalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources 248, 1156–1162 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Y. Li, W. Gao, L. Ci, C. Wang, P.M. Ajayan, Catalytic performance of Pt nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide for methanol electro-oxidation. Carbon 48, 1124–1130 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. G. Girishkumar, T.D. Hall, K. Vinodgopal, P.V. Kamat, Single wall carbon nanotube supports for portable direct methanol fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 110(1), 107–114 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. A. Kongkanand, K. Vinodgopal, S. Kuwabata, P.V. Kamat, Highly dispersed Pt catalysts on single-walled carbon nanotubes and their role in methanol oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. B 110(33), 16185–16188 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. C.Y. Zhai, M.S. Zhu, D. Bin, H.W. Wang, Y.K. Du, C.Y. Wang, P. Yang, Visible-light-assisted electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol using reduced graphene oxide modified Pt nanoflowers—TiO2 nanotube arrays. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 6, 17753–17761 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. C.L. He, Y.X. Jiang, L. Rao, Q. Wang, B.W. Zhang, Y.Y. Li, S.G. Sun, Synthesis of ultrafine size platinum nanoparticles on defective graphene with enhanced performance towards methanol electro-oxidation. Fuel Cells 5, 873–880 (2013)Google Scholar
  37. E. Quesnel, F. Roux, F. Emieux, P. Faucherand, E. Kymakis, G. Volonakis, G. Volonakis, F. Giustino, B.M. Garcia, I. Moreels, S.A. Gursel, Graphene-based technologies for energy applications, challenges and perspectives. 2D Mater. 2, 3 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. A. Iwan, M. Malinowski, G. Pasciak, Polymer fuel cell components modified by graphene: electrodes, electrolytes and bipolar plates. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 49, 954–967 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. L.I. Sanlı, V. Bayram, S. Ghobadi, N. Du¨zen, S.A. Gu¨ rsel, Engineered catalyst layer design with graphene–carbon black hybrid supports for enhanced platinum utilization in PEM fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 1085–1092 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. M.L. Dou, M. Hou, D. Liang, W.T. Lu, Z.G. Shao, B.L. Yi, Nanocluster supported Pt catalyst with high stability for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 92, 468–473 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. N. Muthuraman, P.K. Guruvaiah, P.G. Agneeswara, Mater, high performance carbon supported Pt–WO3 nanocomposite electrocatalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Mater. Chem. Phys. 133, 924–931 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. L. Zhao, Z.B. Wang, X.L. Sui, G.P. Yin, Effect of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with different specific surface areas on the stability of supported Pt catalysts. J. Power Sources 245, 637–643 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. B.Y. Xia, J.N. Wang, S.J. Teng, X.X. Wang, Durability improvement of a Pt catalyst with the use of a graphene carbon support. Chem. 16, 8268–8274 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. L. Zhao, Z.B. Wang, J. Liu, J.J. Zhang, X.L. Sui, L.M. Zhang, D.M. Gu, Facile one-pot synthesis of Pt/grapheme–TiO2 hybrid catalyst with enhanced methanol electrooxidation performance. J. Power Sources 279, 210–217 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. M.M. Shaijumon, S. Ramaprabhu, N. Rajalakshmi, Platinum/multiwalled carbon nanotubes-platinum/carbon composites as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 253105 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. K.C. Kil, S.G. Hong, J.O. Park, C. Pak, H. Chang, U. Paik, The use of MWCNT to enhance oxygen reduction reaction and adhesion strength between catalyst layer and gas diffusion layer in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39, 17481–17486 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. A.K. Roy, C.T. Hsieh, Pulse microwave-assisted synthesis of Pt nanoparticles onto carbon nanotubes as electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 87, 63–72 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. T.K. Lee, J.H. Jung, J.B. Kim, S.H. Hur, Improved durability of Pt/CNT catalysts by the low temperature self-catalyzed reduction for the PEM fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 17992–18000 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Y.J. Wang et al., Carbon-supported Pt-based alloy electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: particle size, shape, and composition manipulation and their impact to activity. Chem. Rev. 115, 3433–3467 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. J. Greeley, I. Stephens, I. Chorkendorff, J.K. Nørskov et al., Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 1, 552–556 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. J.H. Nielsen, T.W. Hansen, A. Nilsson, I. Stephens, I. Chorkendorff, Mass-selected nanoparticles of PtxY as model catalysts for oxygen electroreduction. Nat. Chem. 6, 732–738 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. J. Wu, A. Gross, H. Yang, Shape and composition-controlled platinum alloy nanocrystals using carbon monoxide as reducing agent. Nano Lett. 11(2), 798–802 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Q. Huang, H. Yang, Y. Tang, T. Lu, D.L. Akins, Carbon-supported Pt–Co alloy nanoparticles for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochem. Commun. 8, 1220–1224 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. S. Tominaka, T. Hayashi, Y. Nakamura, T. Osaka, Mesoporous PdCo sponge-like nanostructure synthesized by electrodeposition and dealloying for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 7175–7182 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. T. Maiyalagan, K. Scott, Performance of carbon nanofiber supported Pd–Ni catalysts for electrooxidation of ethanol in alkaline medium. J. Power Sources 195, 5246–5252 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. V. Stamenkovic, B.S. Mun, K.J.J. Mayrhofer, P.N. Ross, N.M. Markovic, J. Rossmeisl et al., Changing the activity of electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction by tuning the surface electronic structure. Angew. Chem. 118, 2963–2967 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. V.R. Stamenkovic, B. Fowler, B.S. Mun, G. Wang, P.N. Ross, C.A. Lucas et al., Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni (111) via increased surface site availability. Science 315, 493–497 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. W.K. Suh, P. Ganesan, B. Son, H. Kim, S. Shanmugam, Graphene supported Pt–Ni nanoparticles for oxygen reduction reaction in acidic electrolyte. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 12983–12994 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. C. Chen, Y. Kang, Z. Huo, Z. Zhu, W. Huang, H. Xin et al., Highly crystalline multimetallic nanoframes with three dimensional electrocatalytic surfaces. Science 343, 1339–1343 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. X. Huang et al., High-performance transition metal-doped pt3ni octahedra for oxygen reduction reaction. Science 348, 1230–1234 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. F. Nosheen, Z. Zhang, G. Xiang, B. Xu, Y. Yang, F. Saleem et al., Three-dimensional hierarchical Pt–Cu superstructures. Nano Res. 8, 832–838 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. H.H. Li, C.H. Cui, S. Zhao, H.B. Yao, M.R. Gao, F.J. Fan et al., Mixed-PtPd-shell PtPdCu nanoparticle nanotubes templated from copper nanowires as efficient and highly durable electrocatalysts. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2, 1182–1187 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. D. Wang, Y. Yu, J. Zhu, S. Liu, D.A. Muller, H.D. Abruña, Morphology and activity tuning of Cu3–Pt/C ordered intermetallic nanoparticles by selective electrochemical dealloying. Nano. Lett. 15, 1343–1348 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. L. Yang, Y. Ding, L. Chen, S. Luo, Y. Tang, C. Liu, Hierarchical reduced graphene oxide supported dealloyed platinumecopper nanoparticles for highly efficient methanol electrooxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 6705–6712 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. L. Yang, Y. Tang, D. Yan, T. Liu, C. Liu, S. Luo, Polyaniline reduced graphene oxide hybrid nanosheets with nearly vertical orientation anchoring palladium nanoparticles for highly active and stable electrocatalysis. ACS. Appl. Mater. Inter. 8, 169–176 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. C. Hu, H. Cheng, Y. Zhao, Y. Hu, Y. Liu, L. Dai et al., Newly designed complex ternary Pt/PdCu nanoboxes anchored on three-dimensional graphene framework for highly efficient ethanol oxidation. Adv. Mater. 24, 5493–5498 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. F. Li, Y. Guo, M. Chen, H. Qiu, X. Sun, W. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Gao, Comparison study of electrocatalytic activity of reduced graphene oxide supported Pt–Cu bimetallic or Pt nanoparticles for the electrooxidation of methanol and ethanol. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 14242–14249 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. W. Wang, B. Lei, S. Guo, Engineering multimetallic nanocrystals for highly efficient oxygen reduction catalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1–16 (2016)Google Scholar
  69. J. Lai, R. Luque, G. Xu, Recent advances in the synthesis and electrocatalytic applications of platinum-based bimetallic alloy nanostructures. ChemCatChem. 7, 3206–3228 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. X. Zhao, S. Chen, Z. Fang, J. Ding, W. Sang, Y. Wang, J. Zhao, Z. Peng, J. Zeng, Octahedral Pd@Pt1.8Ni core–shell nanocrystals with ultrathin PtNi alloy shells as active catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2804–2807 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. R. Zhao, Y. Liu, C. Liu, G. Xu, Y. Chen, Y. Tang, T. Lu, Pd@Pt core–shell tetrapods as highly active and stable electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 20855–20860 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. K. Jukk, N. Kongi, K. Tammeveski, J. Solla-Gullón, J.M. Feliu, PdPt alloy nanocubes as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in acid media. Electrochem. Commun. 56, 11–15 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. B. Jiang, C. Li, V. Malgras, Y. Yamauchi, Synthesis of ternary PtPdCu spheres with three-dimensional nanoporous architectures toward superior electrocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 18053–18058 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. J. Zhang, K. Li, B. Zhang, Synthesis of dendritic Pt–Ni–P alloy nanoparticles with enhanced electrocatalytic properties. Chem. Commun. 51, 12012–12015 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Y. Kuang, Y. Zhang, Z. Cai, G. Feng, Y. Jiang, C. Jin, J. Luo, X. Sun, Single-crystalline dendritic bimetallic and multimetallic nanocubes. Chem. Sci. 6, 7122–7129 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Q. Jia, K. Caldwell, K. Strickland, J.M. Ziegelbauer, Z. Liu, Z. Yu, D.E. Ramaker, S. Mukerjee, Improved oxygen reduction activity and durability of dealloyed PtCox catalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: strain, ligand, and particle size effects. ACS Catal. 5, 176–186 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. S. Zhang, Y. Hao, D. Su, V.V.T. Doan-Nguyen, Y. Wu, J. Li, S. Sun, C.B. Murray, Monodisperse core/shell Ni/FePt nanoparticles and their conversion to Ni/Pt to catalyze oxygen reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15921–15924 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. C. Zhang, W. Sandorf, Z. Peng, Octahedral Pt2CuNi uniform alloy nanoparticle catalyst with high activity and promising stability for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Catal. 5, 2296–2300 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. S.M. Alia, S. Pylypenko, K.C. Neyerlin, D.A. Cullen, S.S. Kocha, B.S. Pivovar, Platinum-coated cobalt nanowires as oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 4, 2680–2686 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. W. Yuan, B. Zhou, J. Hu, J. Deng, Z. Zhang, Y. Tang, Passive direct methanol fuel cell using woven carbon fiber fabric as mass transfer control medium. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40, 2326–2333 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. R. Liu, Y. Jin, P. Xu, X. Xing, Y. Yang, D. Wu, A hybrid-assembly approach towards nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel supported cobalt nanoparticles as high performance oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 464, 83–88 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. K. Kakaei, A. Balavandi, Synthesis of halogen-doped reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as highly efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 463, 46–54 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. J. Liang, M. Hassan, D. Zhu, L. Guo, X. Bo, Cobalt nanoparticles/nitrogen-doped graphene with high nitrogen doping efficiency as noble metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 490, 576–586 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. H. Chai, J. Xu, J. Han, Y. Su, Z. Sun, D. Jia, W. Zhou, Facile synthesis of Mn3O4–rGO hybrid materials for the high-performance electrocatalytic reduction of oxygen. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 488, 251–257 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. K. Kakaei, A. Balavandi, Hierarchically porous fluorine-doped graphene nanosheets as efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction in gas diffusion electrode. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 490, 819–824 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. D. Park, M.S. Ahmed, S. Jeon, Covalent functionalization of graphene with 1,5-diaminonaphthalene and ultrasmall palladium nanoparticles for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 2061–2070 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. L. Zhang, Q. Chang, H. Chen, M. Shao, Recent advances in palladium-based electrocatalysts for fuel cell reactions and hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Energy 29, 198–219 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. S. Mukerjee, Particle size and structural effects in platinum electrocatalysis. J. Appl. Electrochem. 20, 537–548 (1990)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. O. Savadogo, K. Lee, K. Oishi, S. Mitsushima, N. Kamiya, K.I. Ota, New palladium alloys catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction in an acid medium. Electrochem. Commun. 6, 105–109 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. H. Liu, C. Koenigsmann, R.R. Adzic, S.S. Wong, Probing ultrathin one-dimensional Pd–Ni nanostructures as oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. ACS Catal. 4, 2544–2555 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. F.D. Sanij, H. Gharibi, Preparation of bimetallic alloyed palladium–nickel electro-catalysts supported on carbon with superior catalytic performance towards oxygen reduction reaction. Colloids Sur. A 538, 429–442 (2018)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. L.L. He, P. Song, J.J. Feng, W.H. Huang, Q.L. Wang, A.J. Wang, Simple wetchemical synthesis of alloyed PdAu nanochain networks with improved electrocatalytic properties. Electrochim. Acta 176, 86–95 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. J.N. Zheng, L.L. He, F.Y. Chen, A.J. Wang, M.W. Xue, J.J. Feng, Simple one-pot synthesis of platinum–palladium nanoflowers with enhanced catalytic activity and methanol-tolerance for oxygen reduction in acid media. Electrochim. Acta 137, 431–438 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Y.W. Tang, S. Cao, Y. Chen, T.H. Lu, Y.M. Zhou, L.D. Lu, J.C. Bao, Effect of Fe state on electrocatalytic activity of Pd–Fe/C catalyst for oxygen reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 4196–4200 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. L. Zhang, K. Lee, J. Zhang, The effect of heat treatment on nanoparticle size and ORR activity for carbon-supported Pd–Co alloy electrocatalysts. Electrochim. Acta 52, 3088–3094 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. C.L. Vecchio, D. Sebastián, C. Alegre, A.S. Aricò, V. Baglio, Carbon-supported Pd and Pd–Co cathode catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) operating with high methanol concentration. J. Electronal. Chem. 808, 464–473 (2018)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Y. Lee, J. Jang, J.G. Lee, O.S. Jeon, H.S. Kim, H.J. Hwang, Y.G. Shul, Optimization of the Pd–Fe–Mo catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 220, 29–35 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. V. Nallathambi, J.W. Lee, S.P. Kumaraguru, G. Wu, B.N. Popov, Development of high performance carbon composite catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in PEM proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 183, 34–42 (2008)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. K. Strickland et al., Highly active oxygen reduction non-platinum group metal electrocatalyst without direct metal–nitrogen coordination. Nat. Commun. 6, 7343 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. J. Shui, C. Chen, L. Grabstanowicz, D. Zhao, D.J. Liu, Highly efficient nonprecious metal catalyst prepared with metal-organic framework in a continuous carbon nanofibrous network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10629–10634 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. D. Eder, A.H. Windle, Carbon-inorganic hybrid materials: the carbon-nanotube/TiO2 interface. Adv. Mater. 20, 1787–1793 (2008)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. X.L. Sui, Z.B. Wang, C.Z. Li, J.J. Zhang, L. Zhao, D.-M. Gu, S. Guc, Multiphase sodium titanate/titania composite nanostructure as Pt-based supports of methanol oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 840–847 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. S.J. Park, H. Kim, Y.J. Kim, H. Lee, Preparation of carbon-coated TiO2 nanostructures for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 56, 5355–5362 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. M.M. Mohamed, M. Khairy, S. Eid, Activity and stability studies of titanates and titanate–carbon nanotubes supported Ag anode catalysts for direct methanol fuel cell. J. Power Sources 304, 255–265 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. R. Jasinski, A new fuel cell cathode catalyst. Nat. 201, 1212–1213 (1964)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. F. Jaouen et al., Recent advances in non-precious metal catalysis for oxygen-reduction reaction in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 114–130 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. L. Wu et al., Pt-free cathode catalysts prepared via multi-step pyrolysis of Fe phthalocyanine and phenolic resin for fuel cells. Chem. Commun. 46, 6377–6379 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Y.J. Sa et al., A general approach to preferential formation of active Fe–Nx sites in Fe–N/C electrocatalysts for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15046–15056 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. H.T. Chung, J.H. Won, P. Zelenay, Active and stable carbon nanotube/nanoparticle composite electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. Nat. Commu. 4, 1992 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. D. Deng et al., Iron encapsulated within pod-like carbon nanotubes for oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 371–375 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. W. Yang, X. Liu, X. Yue, J. Jia, S. Guo, Bamboo-like carbon nanotube/Fe3C nanoparticle hybrids and their highly efficient catalysis for oxygen reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1436–1439 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. K. Qiu et al., Highly efficient oxygen reduction catalysts by rational synthesis of nanoconfined maghemite in a nitrogen-doped graphene framework. ACS Catal. 6, 3558–3568 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. K. Gong, F. Du, Z. Xia, M. Durstock, L. Dai, Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrays with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction. Science 323, 760–764 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. N. Daems, X. Sheng, I.F. Vankelecom, P.P. Pescarmona, Metal-free doped carbon materials as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 4085–4110 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. C.G. Hu, L.M. Dai, Carbon-based metal-free catalysts for electrocatalysis beyond the ORR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 11736–11758 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. J.T. Zhang, H.L. Li, P.Z. Guo, H.Y. Ma, X.S. Zhao, Rational design of graphitic carbon based nanostructures for advanced electrocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 8497–8511 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Z.H. Sheng, H.L. Gao, W.J. Bao, F.B. Wang, X.H. Xia, Synthesis of boron doped graphene for oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 390–395 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Z. Yang et al., Sulfur-doped graphene as an efficient metal-free cathode catalyst for oxygen reduction. ACS Nano 6, 205–211 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. J. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Z. Xia, L. Dai, A metal-free bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 444–452 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement