- Review
- Open access
- Published:
Microfluidics for disease diagnostics based on surface-enhanced raman scattering detection
Nano Convergence volume 11, Article number: 17 (2024)
Abstract
This review reports diverse microfluidic systems utilizing surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection for disease diagnosis. Integrating SERS detection technology, providing high-sensitivity detection, and microfluidic technology for manipulating small liquid samples in microdevices has expanded the analytical capabilities previously confined to larger settings. This study explores the principles and uses of various SERS-based microfluidic devices developed over the last two decades. Specifically, we investigate the operational principles of documented SERS-based microfluidic devices, including continuous-flow channels, microarray-embedded microfluidic channels, droplet microfluidic channels, digital droplet channels, and gradient microfluidic channels. We also examine their applications in biomedical diagnostics. In conclusion, we summarize the areas requiring further development to translate these SERS-based microfluidic technologies into practical applications in clinical diagnostics.
1 Introduction
Since the introduction of the micro-total analysis system (micro-TAS) by Manz in the early 1990s [1], microfluidic systems have been applied across diverse domains, including biomedical diagnosis, chemical synthesis and analysis, drug discovery, and human healthcare [2, 3]. The global impact of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has underscored the urgent need for on-site diagnostic systems capable of swiftly and accurately analyzing minute clinical samples [4]. Microfluidic devices are viewed as a pivotal technology for meeting this demand. Microfluidic technology is recognized for its ability to precisely control reactions between proteins or DNAs in miniaturized volumes, and is thus considered indispensable for biomedical diagnosis [5,6,7]. However, the detection volume in microfluidic channels, typically at the micron or submicron level, is exceedingly small, as measured in nano- or pico-liters. Consequently, developing highly sensitive detection techniques is imperative [8, 9]. In the early developmental stages of microfluidic technology, researchers relied extensively on on-chip optical detection methods such as UV/vis absorption, laser-induced fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and thermal lens microscopy [10,11,12]. Nevertheless, these approaches have limitations, including poor sensitivity to miniaturized detection volumes and constraints on multiplex detection capability.
Since 2005, a new on-chip detection method that utilizes the aggregation of Au or Ag nanoparticles for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection has emerged for addressing various challenges [13, 14]. This method leverages the localized surface plasmon coupling that occurs in nanogaps between nanoparticles, enabling highly sensitive detection of target molecules through electromagnetic enhancement phenomena [15,16,17,18]. In other words, SERS signal amplification can overcome the inherent low sensitivity of on-chip detection using fluorescence and UV/vis absorption. Additionally, SERS peaks have narrower linewidths than fluorescence or UV/vis absorption bands, providing an advantage for the simultaneous detection of multiple samples, a process known as multiplex detection [19, 20]. However, in SERS detection using lasers, the small focal volume may lead to limited reproducibility when measuring numerous detection spots due to the non-uniform distribution of hotspots [21,22,23]. Fixing laser spots within the microfluidic channel, where target samples flow, and continuously measuring the scattering signal can prospectively enhance the reproducibility owing to ensemble average effects [24,25,26]. Overall, compared with conventional on-chip techniques, SERS-based microfluidic technology has the potential for significantly improved sensitivity, reproducibility, multiplex detection capability, and other features.
This review discusses the configurations and uses of microfluidic devices designed for SERS detection. These devices incorporate diverse microfluidic channels developed using the on-chip SERS detection technology and microfabrication techniques. Although numerous review articles on SERS-based microfluidic devices have been published over the last two decades, to the best of our knowledge, no documented review has specifically addressed the classification and applications of SERS-based microfluidic chips. In this review, we systematically categorize the reported SERS-based microfluidic chips on the basis of the device characteristics, including continuous-flow channels, microarray-embedded microfluidic channels, droplet microfluidic channels, digital droplet channels, and gradient microfluidic channels. Subsequently, we provide an overview of the distinctive designs and sensor application methods for each channel type. This review offers valuable insights into the design and application of SERS-based microfluidic channels, especially for the effective analysis of characteristic biochemical reactions and biomedical diagnoses.
2 Classification of microfluidic devices for SERS detection
2.1 Continuous-flow microfluidic channels
Reproducibility is one of the most challenging issues in the quantitative analysis of target molecules using SERS technology [27, 28]. In other words, controlling the degree of aggregation when forming nanogaps using gold nanoparticles is difficult [29]. Achieving a uniform distribution of target molecules on the substrate surface when measuring Raman signals using nano-substrates is also a challenge [30]. The use of SERS-based microfluidic technologies can address these issues. Controlling reactions in a continuous-flow regime within microfluidic channels maintains homogeneous mixing conditions, enabling sensitive and reproducible detection [31, 32]. The early days of SERS-based microfluidics, introduced in the mid-1990s, initially focused on developing micromixers capable of effectively mixing Au/Ag nanoparticles with the target molecules [33,34,35]. Yan et al. developed a microfluidic system capable of detecting single molecules through two stages of photoinduced reduction (Fig. 1) [36]. Using a focused laser beam at the inlet of the microfluidic channel, they generated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) through the first photo-induced reaction. Continuous scanning of the same laser beam over the residual reactants and AgNPs induced a second reduction reaction, effectively positioning the residual reactants in the nanogaps of the AgNP aggregates to form strong hotspots. During this process, the analyte is removed through photoreduction and photodegradation, virtually eliminating the memory effect caused by the residual reactants. By employing SERS-based microfluidic channels and laser-induced photoreactions, the authors successfully detected substances such as crystal violet, rhodamine 6G, methylene blue, hemoglobin, and 5-fluorouracil at concentrations as low as 10− 13 M.
With the development of effective immunoassays for disease diagnosis in the mid-2000s, microfluidic chips have continued to be developed [37,38,39]. A notable example is the microfluidic biochip (MiChip) integrated with magnetic nano-chains created by Xiong et al., which enabled rapid liquid mixing and simultaneous bio separation for the ultrasensitive detection of cancer protein biomarkers and bacteria (Fig. 2) [40]. As depicted in the figure, a coil capable of generating a magnetic field was embedded in the MiChip. Capture antibody-conjugated Magchains operated with a magnetic stirrer were utilized, and detection antibody-conjugated SERS-encoded probes were mixed within the chamber, effectively generating magnetic immunocomplexes. Subsequently, the complexes were magnetically separated into a detection chamber, followed by SERS analysis.
Morelli et al. developed an automated centrifugal microfluidic device comprising eight calibration modules with integrated sample pretreatment functions, and four assay modules with SERS detection capabilities (Fig. 3) [41]. They successfully utilized the fabricated microfluidic channels to detect a secondary bacterial metabolite (p-coumaric acid) in bacterial supernatant, with high sensitivity. The developed lab-on-a-disk device was assessed as a new tool for the real-time and high-throughput screening of various bacteria.
2.2 Microarray-embedded fluidic channels
Most microfluidic devices are limited to the analysis of only a single target. Microarray-embedded microfluidic devices composed of multiplex nanostructured components that simultaneously measure multiple targets have been developed to overcome this limitation [42,43,44]. Sevim et al. developed a device with numerous SERS substrates embedded within a single microfluidic channel for detecting various analytes simultaneously on a single microfluidic chip (Fig. 4) [45]. This design employs microfluidic spatial control to localize multiple target gas samples on multiple SERS substrates.
Yang et al. developed a SERS-based microfluidic channel by embedding a microarray of nanoparticles in a microfluidic channel, enabling the simultaneous measurement of various volatile organic compounds (VOCs), as shown in Fig. 5 [46]. Sensitive and simultaneous measurement of various VOCs adsorbed on SERS substrates through physisorption or chemisorption mechanisms was possible. This technology can be directly applied to indoor air pollution monitoring or exhaled-breath-based diagnoses.
2.3 Microdroplet channels
The microfluidic platform operates via two flow regimes: continuous and segmented (droplets). While the continuous flow regime is advantageous for easily creating homogeneous mixing conditions that facilitate quantitative analysis of the generated products, the deposition of nanoparticle aggregates (memory effects) on the channel surface is a disadvantage when using SERS detection technology with AuNPs or AgNPs [47]. This memory effect leads to decreased sensitivity and reproducibility [36, 48]. A microdroplet system using two-phase liquid-flow segmented flow was developed to address the memory effect issue [49,50,51]. Using this system, monodisperse, nanoliter-sized liquid droplets can be generated in a high-throughput manner within an immiscible carrier fluid. Compared to the single-phase flow, the two-phase segmented flow offers enhanced reproducibility by measuring the Raman signals of rapidly moving droplets, without memory effects.
Park et al. developed a groundbreaking microdroplet sensor that significantly enhanced the sensitivity and reproducibility of SARS-CoV-2 detection [52]. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 has traditionally involved lateral flow assay strips for detecting nucleocapsid protein biomarkers. However, owing to sensitivity limitations, false-negative diagnostic ratios have increased. Additionally, the RT-PCR method for detecting viral RNA has the drawbacks of lengthy diagnostic times and difficulty in on-site diagnosis. To overcome these challenges, we developed a microdroplet sensor for SARS-CoV-2 detection with dramatically improved sensitivity and reproducibility.
Figure 6 illustrates the structure of the microdroplet sensor used for detecting SARS-CoV-2. The channel is composed of four compartments: (i) droplet generation, (ii) droplet mixing, (iii) droplet splitting, and (iv) SERS detection. By simultaneously injecting the SARS-CoV-2 lysate, capturing the antibody-conjugated magnetic beads, and detecting the antibody-conjugated SERS nanotags in the three inlets of the microfluidic channel, an immunoreaction occurs between the three components as they pass through the winding channel, forming sandwich magnetic immunocomplexes. The generated magnetic immunocomplexes pass through splitting channels containing embedded magnetic bars, separating them from the supernatant solution and removing unreacted SERS nanotags and non-binding species. Finally, the optical signal of the remaining SERS nanotags in the supernatant solution is measured, allowing quantification of the SARS-CoV-2 lysate based on the concentration-dependent SERS signal. When using this SERS-based microdroplet sensor for SARS-CoV-2 detection, the authors achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.22 PFU/mL with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 1.79%, and detection was possible within 10 min.
Oliveria et al. developed a SERS-based microfluidic sensor capable of multiplex phenotype analysis of single cancer cells (Fig. 7) [53]. Cancer cells labeled with different SERS nanotags capable of recognizing membrane proteins were individually encapsulated in microdroplets. Subsequently, the microdroplets were imaged using SERS spectroscopy. This SERS-based microdroplet sensor represents a novel technique that allows oncologists to rapidly discern the phenotype of cancer cells in a high-throughput manner, thereby enabling rapid therapeutic decision-making.
Li et al. developed a femtoliter surface oil droplet-based microfluidic channel for the trace analysis of hydrophobic compounds in aqueous solutions (Fig. 8) [54]. In this system, femtoliter droplets are formed on the surface of a solid substrate within a simple microfluidic chamber, enabling the sequential extraction and concentration of target molecules. The AgNPs adhere to the droplet surface, forming SERS-active hotspots. This droplet system offers advantages such as a large surface-to-volume ratio, tunable chemical composition of the droplets, and long-term stability. This droplet system can prospectively be utilized for the sensitive analysis of various chemical compounds.
2.4 Digital microfluidics
To address the challenges associated with conventional microfluidic channels requiring external pumps and valves for flow control, which complicate downsizing and pose issues such as channel dead volume and cross-contamination, a digital microfluidic (DMF) chip driven by dielectric electrowetting was developed [55,56,57]. This chip operates without pumps or valves instead of applying a potential to an electrode array on the substrate to enable droplet transport, merging, splitting, and distribution. Liu et al. developed a SERS-based DMF chip for the automated and highly sensitive detection of explosives in a high-throughput manner (Fig. 9) [58]. A DMF chip with 40 drives and eight storage electrodes was fabricated to implement a high-throughput process. Different concentrations of the target molecules, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), and salts were loaded onto the DMF chip. Subsequently, droplet merging, incubation, and detection processes were automated using the SERS-DMF platform. During these processes, hotspots inducing SERS effects were formed by the AgNPs, facilitated by the use of salts at varying concentrations. The authors utilized this SERS-DMF platform to measure the concentrations of two types of explosives, trinitrotoluene and 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one, achieving LODs of 10− 7 M and 10− 8 M, respectively, for each explosive.
Das et al. developed a SERS-DMF platform that utilizes electrostatic spraying (ESTAS) to move a target sample from microdroplets formed on a DMF chip to an external SERS substrate for measurement (Fig. 10) [59]. This technology is highly effective for monitoring the organic reactions in DMF devices. Moreover, the micro spray-hole chip system with ESTAS allowed SERS detection within the chip without colloidal nanoparticles.
2.5 Gradient microfluidic channels
Several technical problems arise when performing bioassays using gold-patterned microarray chips [60,61,62]. First, achieving a uniform distribution of the target biomarkers on the gold well is challenging because of the limited control of the homogenous immobilization and washing of the target molecules when utilizing a micropipette. Second, because all biomolecules are exposed to air before being fixed on the surface of the gold well, exposure of the biomolecules to air may reduce their biological activity. Finally, repeating the washing steps to remove non-specifically bound species is inconvenient. Additionally, for analyzing various concentrations of target molecules, stock solutions must be prepared, and assays must be performed for each concentration after serial dilution. Therefore, new assays that can overcome the drawbacks of manually controlled and time-consuming assays are required. This can be achieved using programmable and fully automatic gradient microfluidic channels.
Chon et al. developed a gradient microfluidic channel that could automatically obtain serial dilutions of target molecules, as shown in Fig. 11 [63]. A chip embedded with solenoid magnets was fabricated in a microfluidic channel capable of generating gradient flows at various concentrations. The chip consisted of three compartments. In the first compartment, the gradient channel structure automatically generated a series of antigen solutions of different concentrations. In the second compartment, antibody-conjugated magnetic beads and detection antibody-conjugated hollow gold nanospheres (SERS nanotags) were injected to form magnetic immunocomplexes under flow conditions with different concentrations of the target antigens generated in the first compartment. A groove-shaped mixer was incorporated to enhance the mixing efficiency in the channels of the first two compartments. In the last compartment, two solenoids were placed on either side of the channel to effectively trap the generated magnetic immunocomplexes. The SERS signal of the captured magnetic immunocomplexes on the channel wall was measured, enabling the quantitative analysis of four different concentrations of antigens. Overall, the SERS-based gradient microfluidic channel enabled automatic and highly reproducible detection of the four antigens at different concentrations.
Choi et al. developed a SERS-based micro network gradient microfluidic platform for two types of DNA oligomer mixtures related to breast cancer (Fig. 12) [64]. The authors designed a microfluidic circuit using an electric-hydraulic analogy to create an on-demand concentration gradient. This microfluidic platform enabled the measurement of SERS signals from duplex DNA oligomer mixtures in different ratios under flow conditions. This microfluidic sensor can automatically generate highly accurate concentration ratios of two DNAs through gradient flow control without tedious manual mixing. Moreover, the assay time is less than 10 min. The Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) is a pivotal procedure for the prompt identification of suitable antibiotics for patients with bacterial infections. Determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of a specific antibiotic for AST is of paramount significance [65]. Assessing bacterial responses to diverse antibiotic concentrations and determining the optimal antibiotic concentration are essential effectively prescribing antibiotics. However, preparing a series of antibiotic concentrations is tedious and labor-intensive.
To address this challenge, Lin et al. devised a SERS-based antibiotic concentration gradient microfluidic device for multiplex antimicrobial susceptibility tests, as illustrated in Fig. 13 [66]. The main channel facilitates the flow of the antibiotic solution and pure medium to generate antibiotic concentration gradients. These gradients subsequently diffuse into the side channels through a laminar flow regime and are distributed to the bacteria in each microwell. Every stage of the AST, including bacterial loading, antibiotic gradient generation, washing, and bacterial growth with an antibiotic, can be executed on a single chip. Alterations in the bacterial cells loaded onto SERS-active substrates within each microwell are monitored by SERS detection following antibiotic treatment. The SERS-based AST method requires a smaller sample volume of approximately 20 µL and yields results within 5 h compared to traditional AST methods, offering efficiency advantages. In this review, various types of SERS-based microfluidic chips developed so far have been introduced. We compared their key features, advantages, and limitations in Table 1.
3 Conclusion and outlook
This comprehensive review explores the diverse microfluidic devices that utilize SERS for disease diagnosis. Microfluidic technology, which offers a synergistic combination of high sensitivity and precise sample control using nano-liter volumes, is anticipated to find active applications in point-of-care (POC) diagnosis, particularly for swift and accurate assessments of infectious disease scenarios. In the realm of in vitro diagnostics, where diseases are identified by analyzing human fluids such as blood, urine, and nasal discharge, chemiluminescence or fluorescence detection based on light absorption‒emission processes has traditionally dominated. However, these methods often have low sensitivity or present logistical challenges for onsite diagnosis. Consequently, the SERS detection method has emerged as a solution for overcoming these limitations and holds substantial promise as a next-generation POC diagnostic technology.
The effective implementation of this SERS microfluidic technique requires several technological advancements. First, there is a demand for the miniaturization of Raman spectrophotometers. Although numerous portable Raman spectrophotometers have been commercialized, the continuous development of user-friendly, handheld, and touch-panel-enabled Raman spectrophotometers is essential for seamless application in on-site diagnostics. For instance, recently Joung et al. developed a portable Raman reader capable of quantitatively measuring the Raman signal of the test and control lines of a SERS-based lateral flow assay (LFA) strip. This SERS-based POC assay system has approximately 100 times higher sensitivity than commercialized strips that determine infection status through color changes. When utilized for COVID-19 diagnosis, it can significantly reduce the false-negative diagnostic rate [67, 68].
Second, miniaturizing syringe pumps and developing techniques for precise flow control within microfluidic channels without pumps is imperative. Despite the potential for miniaturization of microfluidic devices, challenges persist in downsizing the pumps required for flow control, which hinders the construction of POC systems. Third, establishing a Raman spectral database for amassed clinical samples and integrating machine learning (ML) technology based on this spectral database are crucial for enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Finally, active translational research is indispensable for translating the developed highly sensitive measurement technologies from the laboratory to real clinical settings. Rapid translation necessitates close collaboration among Raman spectroscopists, engineers for developing portable spectrometer systems, software engineers for crafting spectroscopic drivers and ML algorithms, and medical professionals to oversee clinical validation and field usage. To effectively leverage these technologies in clinical settings, collaborative and targeted research efforts are imperative.
References
A. Manz, N. Graber, H.M. Widmer, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 1, 244 (1990)
A. Khademhosseini, R. Langer, J. Borenstein, J.P. Vacanti, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 2480 (2006)
A.J. deMello, Nature 442, 394 (2006)
S. Lee, L. Bi, H. Chen, D. Lin, R. Mei, Y. Wu, L. Chen, S.-W. Joo, J. Choo, Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 8500 (2023)
K.S. Elvira, X. Casadevall i Solvas, R.C. Wootton, A.J. deMello, Nat. Chem. 5, 905 (2013)
D.T. Chiu, A.J. deMello, D. Di Carlo, P.S. Doyle, C. Hansen, R.M. Maceiczyk, R.C. Wootton, Chem. 2, 201 (2017)
D. Belder, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 3736 (2009)
H. Chen, A. Das, L. Bi, N. Choi, J.-I. Moon, Y. Wu, S. Park, J. Choo, Nanoscale 12, 21560 (2020)
L. Ngo, L.Q.A. Pham, A. Tukova, A. Hassanzadeh-Barforoushi, W. Zhang, Y. Wang, Lab Chip 23, 2899 (2023)
H. Craighead, Nature 442, 387 (2006)
P.S. Dittrich, K. Tachikawa, A. Manz, Anal. Chem. 78, 3887 (2006)
P.-A. Auroux, D. Iossifidis, D.R. Reyes, A. Manz, Anal. Chem. 74, 2637 (2002)
L. Chen, J. Choo, Electrophoresis 29, 1815 (2008)
T. Park, S. Lee, G.H. Seong, J. Choo, E.K. Lee, Y.S. Kim, W.H. Ji, S.Y. Hwang, D.-G. Gweon, S. Lee, Lab Chip 5, 437 (2005)
S. Nie, S.R. Emory, Sci. 275, 1102 (1997)
K. Kneipp, Y. Wang, H. Kneipp, L.T. Perelman, I. Itzkan, R.R. Dasari, M.S. Feld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1667 (1997)
B. Sharma, R.R. Frontiera, A.-I. Henry, E. Ringe, R.P. Van Duyne, Mater. Today. 15, 16 (2012)
H. Dang, S.-G. Park, Y. Wu, N. Choi, J.-Y. Yang, S. Lee, S.-W. Joo, L. Chen, J. Choo, Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2105703 (2021)
J.H. Granger, N.E. Schlotter, A.C. Crawford, M.D. Porter, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 3865 (2016)
L.A. Lane, X. Qian, S. Nie, Chem. Rev. 115, 10489 (2015)
B.-B. Xu, Z.-C. Ma, L. Wang, R. Zhang, L.-G. Niu, Z. Yang, Y.-L. Zhang, W.-H. Zheng, B. Zhao, Y. Xu, Q.-D. Chen, H. Xia, H.-B. Sun, Lab Chip 11, 3347 (2011)
A. Kamińska, E. Witkowska, K. Winkler, I. Dzięcielewski, J.L. Weyher, J. Waluk, Biosens. Bioelectron. 66, 461 (2015)
J. Jeon, N. Choi, H. Chen, J.-I. Moon, L. Chen, J. Choo, Lab Chip 19, 674 (2019)
R. Gao, Z. Cheng, X. Wang, L. Yu, Z. Guo, G. Zhao, J. Choo, Biosens. Bioelectron. 119, 126 (2018)
N. Choi, J. Lee, J. Ko, J.H. Jeon, G. Rhie, A.J. deMello, J. Choo, Anal. Chem. 89, 8413 (2017)
R. Gao, Z. Cheng, A.J. deMello, J. Choo, Lab Chip 16, 1022 (2016)
J.-I. Moon, E.J. Choi, Y. Joung, J.-W. Oh, S.-W. Joo, J. Choo, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 400, 134916 (2024)
H. Chen, S.-G. Park, N. Choi, J.-I. Moon, H. Dang, A. Das, S. Lee, D.-G. Kim, L. Chen, J. Choo, Biosens. Bioelectron. 167, 112496 (2020)
D. Graham, D.G. Thompson, W.E. Smith, K. Faulds, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 548 (2008)
Z. Wang, S. Zong, L. Wu, D. Zhu, Y. Cui, Chem. Rev. 117, 7910 (2017)
A. Walter, A. März, W. Schumacher, P. Rösch, J. Popp, Lab Chip 11, 1013 (2011)
K.R. Strehle, D. Cialla, P. Rösch, T. Henkel, M. Köhler, J. Popp, Anal. Chem. 79, 1542 (2007)
Y.S. Huh, A.J. Chung, B. Cordovez, D. Erickson, Lab Chip 9, 433 (2009)
D. Lee, S. Lee, G.H. Seong, J. Choo, E.K. Lee, D.-G. Gweon, S. Lee, Appl. Spectrosc. 60, 373 (2006)
B.D. Piorek, C. Andreou, M. Moskovits, C.D. Meinhart, Anal. Chem. 86, 1061 (2014)
W. Yan, L. Yang, J. Chen, Y. Wu, P. Wang, Z. Li, Adv. Mater. 29, 1702893 (2017)
C.D. Chin, T. Laksanasopin, Y.K. Cheung, D. Steinmiller, V. Linder, H. Parsa, J. Wang, H. Moore, R. Rouse, G. Umviligihozo, E. Karita, L. Mwambarangwe, S.L. Braunstein, J. van de Wijgert, R. Sahabo, J.E. Justman, W. El-Sadr, S.K. Sia, Nat. Med. 17, 1015 (2011)
C. Chen, J. Skog, C.-H. Hsu, R.T. Lessard, L. Balaj, T. Wurdinger, B.S. Carter, X.O. Breakefield, M. Toner, D. Irimia, Lab Chip 10, 505 (2010)
M.M. Gong, D. Sinton, Chem. Rev. 117, 8447 (2017)
Q. Xiong, C.Y. Lim, J. Ren, J. Zhou, K. Pu, M.B. Chan-Park, H. Mao, Y.C. Lam, H. Duan, Nat. Commun. 9, 1743 (2018)
L. Morelli, L. Serioli, F.A. Centorbi, C.B. Jendresen, M. Matteucci, O. Ilchenko, D. Demarchi, A.T. Nielsen, K. Zór, A. Boisen, Lab Chip 18, 869 (2018)
M. Lee, K. Lee, K.H. Kim, K.W. Oh, J. Choo, Lab Chip 12, 3720 (2012)
S. Kumar, S. Cherukulappurath, T.W. Johnson, S.-H. Oh, Chem. Mater. 26, 6523 (2014)
L. Wu, Z. Wang, K. Fan, S. Zong, Y. Cui, Small 11, 2798 (2015)
S. Sevim, C. Franco, X.-Z. Chen, A. Sorrenti, D. Rodríguez-San‐Miguel, S. Pané, A.J. deMello, J. Puigmartí‐Luis, Adv. Sci. 7, 1903172 (2020)
K. Yang, C. Zhang, K. Zhu, Z. Qian, Z. Yang, L. Wu, S. Zong, Y. Cui, Z. Wang, ACS Nano 16, 19335 (2022)
T.-A. Meier, E. Poehler, F. Kemper, O. Pabst, H.-G. Jahnke, E. Beckert, A. Robitzki, D. Belder, Lab Chip 15, 2923 (2015)
J. Plou, M. Charconnet, I. García, J. Calvo, L.M. Liz-Marzán, ACS Nano 15, 8984 (2021)
R. Gao, N. Choi, S.-I. Chang, E.K. Lee, J. Choo, Nanoscale 6, 8781 (2014)
G. Wang, C. Lim, L. Chen, H. Chon, J. Choo, J. Hong, A.J. deMello, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 394, 1827 (2009)
E. Chung, R. Gao, J. Ko, N. Choi, D.W. Lim, E.K. Lee, S.-I. Chang, J. Choo, Lab Chip 13, 260 (2013)
S. Park, C.S. Jeon, N. Choi, J.-I. Moon, K.M. Lee, S.H. Pyun, T. Kang, J. Choo, Chem. Eng. J. 446, 137085 (2022)
K. Oliveira, A. Teixeira, J.M. Fernandes, C. Lopes, A. Chícharo, P. Piairo, L. Wu, L. Rodríguez-Lorenzo, L. Diéguez, S. Abalde‐Cela, Adv. Opt. Mater. 11, 2201500 (2023)
M. Li, B. Dyett, H. Yu, V. Bansal, X. Zhang, Small 15, 1804683 (2019)
M. Abdelgawad, A.R. Wheeler, Adv. Mater. 21, 920 (2009)
D.G. Rackus, M.H. Shamsi, A.R. Wheeler, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5320 (2015)
A.R. Wheeler, Sci. 322, 539 (2008)
W. Liu, Z. Wang, Z. Liu, J. Chen, L. Shi, L. Huang, Y. Liu, S. Cui, X. He, ACS Sens. 8, 1733 (2023)
A. Das, S. Fehse, M. Polack, R. Panneerselvam, D. Belder, Anal. Chem. 95, 1262 (2023)
M. Lee, S. Lee, J. Lee, H. Lim, G.H. Seong, E.K. Lee, S.-I. Chang, C.H. Oh, J. Choo, Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 2135 (2011)
K.K. Strelau, R. Kretschmer, R. Möller, W. Fritzsche, J. Popp, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 396, 1381 (2010)
R.A. Wallace, N.V. Lavrik, M.J. Sepaniak, Electrophoresis 38, 361 (2017)
H. Chon, C. Lim, S.-M. Ha, Y. Ahn, E.K. Lee, S.-I. Chang, G.H. Seong, J. Choo, Anal. Chem. 82, 5290 (2010)
N. Choi, K. Lee, D.W. Lim, E.K. Lee, S.-I. Chang, K.W. Oh, J. Choo, Lab Chip 12, 5160 (2012)
I. Wiegand, K. Hilpert, R.E. Hancock, Nat. Protoc. 3, 163 (2008)
S.-J. Lin, P.-H. Chao, H.-W. Cheng, J.-K. Wang, Y.-L. Wang, Y.-Y. Han, N.-T. Huang, Lab Chip 22, 1805 (2022)
M. Lu, Y. Joung, C.S. Jeon, S. Kim, D. Yong, H. Jang, S.H. Pyun, T. Kang, J. Choo, Nano Converg. 9, 39 (2022)
Y. Joung, K. Kim, S. Lee, B.-S. Chun, S. Lee, J. Hwang, S. Choi, T. Kang, M.-K. Lee, L. Chen, J. Choo, ACS Sens. 7, 3470 (2022)
Funding
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea through grant numbers 2019R1A2C3004375 and 2020R1A5A1018052, as well as the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xiangdong Wu: Conceptualization, Organizing research papers, Sohyun Park: Conceptualization, Organizing research papers, Sungwoon Lee: Conceptualization, Writing—Review, Sang-Woo Joo: Conceptualization, Writing—Review & Editing, Jaebum Choo: Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Writing—Review & Editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the research reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, X., Park, S., Lee, S. et al. Microfluidics for disease diagnostics based on surface-enhanced raman scattering detection. Nano Convergence 11, 17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-024-00424-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-024-00424-7