Flexible nanopillar-based electrochemical sensors for genetic detection of foodborne pathogens
© The Author(s) 2018
Received: 29 March 2018
Accepted: 29 May 2018
Published: 6 June 2018
Flexible and highly ordered nanopillar arrayed electrodes have brought great interest for many electrochemical applications, especially to the biosensors, because of its unique mechanical and topological properties. Herein, we report an advanced method to fabricate highly ordered nanopillar electrodes produced by soft-/photo-lithography and metal evaporation. The highly ordered nanopillar array exhibited the superior electrochemical and mechanical properties in regard with the wide space to response with electrolytes, enabling the sensitive analysis. As-prepared gold and silver electrodes on nanopillar arrays exhibit great and stable electrochemical performance to detect the amplified gene from foodborne pathogen of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Additionally, lightweight, flexible, and USB-connectable nanopillar-based electrochemical sensor platform improves the connectivity, portability, and sensitivity. Moreover, we successfully confirm the performance of genetic analysis using real food, specially designed intercalator, and amplified gene from foodborne pathogens with high reproducibility (6% standard deviation) and sensitivity (10 × 1.01 CFU) within 25 s based on the square wave voltammetry principle. This study confirmed excellent mechanical and chemical characteristics of nanopillar electrodes have a great and considerable electrochemical activity to apply as genetic biosensor platform in the fields of point-of-care testing (POCT).
As continuous worldwide growth of food industry, rapid detection of foodborne pathogens has been brought great interests in public health surveillance in a human’s daily life [1–3]. Trade of contaminated food between communities and/or countries continuously increase health risk and microbial pathogens in food are of major concerns to all governments [4, 5]. Although conventional detection method of culture and colony counting method and immunology-based method are proposed, the great amount of population suffers from foodborne diseases every years [6–10]. Moreover, rapid and early detection of pathogenic microbial is still considered as the most important but difficult tasks because of requirement of collaboration of multiple disciplinary including food microbiology, chemistry, clinical medicine, and laboratory medicine and demands of complex handling processes, experts, complicated detection method, and expensive equipment [11–14]. Therefore, the next generation of detection tool kits with nanotechnology incorporated lightweight, portable, and flexible/wearable biosensor platforms have been brought great attentions for realization of on-site analysis of specific target bioanalytes including microorganisms, protein, toxins, and nucleic acids [15–18].
Recently, flexible sensors have received a great deal of attention as a point of care testing (POCT) platforms for the continuous monitoring of foodborne illness. POCT technologies offers reduce operating time, simplicity, easy-to-use, portability, non-expertise, relatively cheap, and rapid decision making [19–22]. Of the various materials used to date, polymer is one of the most widely used flexible and bendable substrate in human’s daily life because of its low permeability, low electrical conductivity, excellent chemical stability, strong mechanical stability, and functionality [23–26]. These unique characteristics make polymer a compatible platform for the construction of flexible electrochemical biosensors. To construct of highly flexible and bendable electrochemical biosensors, polymer nanopillar arrays have been proposed and demonstrated its excellent performance [27–29]. In particular, the conductive nanopillar arrays enable to realize high surface area, high aspect ratio, enhancement of mass transfer, easy control of surface functionalization offer great potential as electrode materials in electrochemical sensing applications [30–32]. Using the combination of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and electrochemical sensing. Among them, electrochemical sensors offers simple, portable, and effective detection of genetic level of foodborne pathogens is urgent and important to prevent outbreak of foodborne diseases .
Herein, inspiring from the previous findings, we developed a polyaniline nanopillar array-based flexible/bendable electrochemical sensors for genetic analysis of foodborne pathogens. Combination of polymeric blend and photo-/soft-lithography allowed us to prepare flexible/bendable nanopillar array substrate. The sensing electrode was fabricated via patterning of gold layers on nanopillar array substrate and used as a working and counter electrodes while silver was patterned as a reference electrode. Produced nanopillar arrayed electrode were applied in an electrochemical sensor and showed excellent electrochemical performances. The as-prepared electrochemical sensors demonstrated excellent genetic detection with benefits of simple fabrication, scalability, high sensitivity, good reproducibility and specificity using realistic foodborne pathogen models. Additionally, it showed considerable potential as genetic biosensor platform for POCT.
2.1 Materials and apparatus
UV polymerizable NOA63 (Norland Optic Adhesives), PU (MINS-311RM, Minuta Tech.), and PET film (MITSUBISHI, Japan) were purchased and used without further purification. GoTaq®DNA polymerase (M3005) was from Promega. E. coli O157:H7 (ATCC 43894) was obtained from ATCC. QuickExtract™ DNA extraction solution 1.0 (QE09050) was purchased from Epicentre. 2′-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-5-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-2,5′-bi-1H-benzimidazole trihydrochloride hydrate, bisBenzimide (Hoechst 33258), and 2′-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-2,5′-bi-1H-benzimidazole trihydrochloride hydrate, bisBenzimide (HEPES) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The thermal cycler (C1000Touch™) device was obtained from Bio-Rad. UV visualizer (LIAS Slite 140) was obtained from Avegene Life Sciences. The DNA extraction and purification solution (QIAamp DNA mini kit, 51304) was purchased from QIAGEN. The electrochemical evaluation was carried out with the 630B (CH Instruments). The electron beam evaporator (EBS400) was purchased from EVATEC.
2.2 Fabrication of nanopillar electrodes
Nanopillar arrays were initially fabricated on the Si wafers by using of photo/soft-lithography followed by oxygen penetration and dry etching, producing the cylindrical shapes with diameters of 500 nm and heights of 1500 nm. Then, the composition of polyurethane acrylate (PU) and NOA63 (NO) as 7:3 (v/v) was selected in the study based on the previous report [27, 28]. To fabricate the flexible substrate, the PUNO was detached from the wall of the Si mold. The formation of thin titanium and gold layers by vacuum sputtered on the surface of nanopillar arrays with assistance of stencil mask. As prepared gold electrodes applied as working and counter electrode. Then, silver electrode was further printed on the nanopillar using silver paste and it was used as a reference electrode.
2.3 Structure and electroactivity characterization of nanopillar electrode
The structure of nanopillar arrays on the electrode was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The electrochemical behavior of nanopillar was determined by cyclic voltammetry (CV) scanning the voltage from − 0.1 to 1.6 V at 50 mV/s in the 50 mM H2SO4. The NPE stability was investigated by scanning the scan rate from 10 to 500 mV/s and 30 time CV cycling at the 10 and 50 mV/s using the 5 mM ferrocyanide.
2.4 E. coli O157:H7 preparation
The E. coli O157:H7 was cultured in the Luria–Bertani (LB) broth including the sodium chloride, yeast extract, and tryptone in 100 mL distilled water at 37 °C for 18 h. By using the colony counting method, the cells number suspended in the broth was estimated. The suspended E. coli O157:H7 were spiked into a broth or milk sample concentration from 1.0 × 101 to 1.0 × 105 per 100 µL broth or 1 mL milk. The each prepared E. coli O157:H7 samples were stored at 4 °C until use. The gDNA from each cells was extracted and purified for evaluation.
2.5 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) condition for E. coli O157:H7
The genomic sequences of eaeA gene of E. coli O157:H7 was from GenBank. The forward primer was 5′-GACCCGGCACAAGCATAAGC-3′, and the reverse primer was 5′-CCACCTGCAGCAACAAGAGG-3′. The total amplified gene sizes were 384 bp. The extracted and purified gene of E. coli O157:H7 was reacted with a PCR mixture containing the dNTP (dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP), MgSO4, forward and reverse primer, and polymerase. The following PCR thermocycling procedures was employed: 95 °C for 300 s (pre-denaturation) and 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s (denaturation of double-stranded DNA template), 60 °C for 30 s (annealing of each primer to the single-stranded DNA template), 72 °C for 30 s (synthesizing the DNA strand complementary to the template strand by polymerase), and 72 °C for 300 s (final elongation).
2.6 Nanopillar-based electrochemical detection of E. coli O157:H7
The amplified gene of E. coli O157:H7 was mixed with the Hoechst electrolyte, which specifically intercalates with double-stranded DNA. The electrochemical determination was implemented by analyzing the current in a final Hoechst concentration at 33.3 μM solution. The mixture of Hoechst with amplified gene was assessed to the NPE by square wave voltammetry (SWV) method. The potential scanning from 0 to 0.5 V was performed under 0.025 V amplitude and 25 Hz frequency at 50 mV/s within 25 s.
3 Result and discussion
3.1 Manipulation and structure confirmation of flexible nanopillar electrode (NPE)
In this study, the 500 nm width and 1500 nm height nanopillar was produced with the center-to-center distance of 1000 nm. To verify the uniformity of the nanopillar structure, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to investigate the morphology of sensor surface as shown in Fig. 1e. The SEM image revealed that the nanopillar was equally arranged in the length and breadth, and the same height of nanopillar arrays were also uniformly produced . Additionally, the flat gold deposition on the surface was observed. Based on the obtained result, the designed NPE was accurately manipulated with high reproducibility, and the electroactivity of NPE was further carried out using electrochemical experiment.
3.2 Characterization of nanopillar electrode
3.3 Electrochemical evaluation of E. coli O157:H7
In order to demonstrate the electrochemical performance of NPE, the mixture of amplified pathogen gene and Hoechst were prepared and applied to investigate the sensing capability. As the pristine Hoechst inducing the electrochemical signals, the obtained signal was reversely proportional to the target gene concentration. The registered electrochemical signal from E. coli O157:H7 test was measured and presented in Fig. 3c, the voltammogram from each test was gradually increased in accordance of E. coli O157:H7 concentration. The calibration curve was presented based on the peak current as shown in Fig. 3d. In the test result, a good linear relationship as corresponding to the target concentration represented that the introduced Hoechst-based signaling principle was properly performed with NPE. In the calibration curve, the signals from 1.0 × 1.01 to 1.0 × 105 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 demonstrated a linear response. The obtained electrochemical test results were highly correlated with optical signal from Fig. 3b. This result strongly supported the reliability of the developed NPE-based biosensing system. Additionally, the developed sensing system could be able to serve as the new analytical system on behalf of the conventional gel electrophoresis method. The conventional optical detection method required about 30 min while the developed sensing system could rapidly analyze the target gene within 25 s, effectively reducing the 1/70-fold detection time. The calibration curve exhibited the saturation at the high concentration of E. coli O157:H7, while the signals were clearly distinguished in the linear detection range, indicating the high sensitivity of nanopillar electrode to the small amount of target gene . Based on the obtained test result, the limit of detection for E. coli O157:H7 evaluation was 1.0 × 101 CFU which is the clear evidence of high sensitivity of the nanopillar-based sensing system. To verify the reproducibility of the NPE to detect the E. coli O157:H7, the intra- and inter-assay was implemented at least three times under same experimental condition such as pH, temperature, and reaction time (Fig. 3d). The calculated coefficient of variation (COV) was about 10% for the whole E. coli O157:H7 test. The correlation coefficient in the linear detection range from 1.0 × 1.01 to 1.0 × 105 CFU test also confirmed, and the calculated R2 value was 0.99 because of the high reproducibility and reliability of NPE. Based on the findings, the test result demonstrated that the developed NPE-based sensing system could be a stable and reliable platform to detect foodborne pathogen of E. coli O157:H7.
3.4 Real sample-based E. coli O157:H7 analysis
The signal variation to the intra- and inter-assay was further carried out. The prepared E. coli O157:H7-spiked milk was repeatedly estimated under same condition including the pH, temperature, and reaction time. The error bar in Fig. 4b indicate the signal variation to the each E. coli O157:H7 evaluation. The calculated COV in whole obtained result is 6% and it is the reasonable reproducibility of NPE to the real food-based E. coli O157:H7 analysis. In regard with the requirements of sensitive and rapid analysis of pathogens causative of foodborne illnesses, the developed NPE successfully accomplished the feasibility performance for molecular diagnostic system to use in POCT.
We demonstrated a reliable process for fabrication of flexible and highly arrayed NPE-based sensing platforms by using photo-/soft-lithography and a subsequent electrode patterning process. The NPE showed a great mechanical stability and electrochemical properties. Additionally, USB connectable design allows us to realize easy accessibility and in situ analyze the existence of foodborne pathogens via detection of electrochemical signals. We also investigated the biosensing performance using real food with pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 based on intercalation of Hoechst and amplified gene. The NPE-base electochemical sensors exhibited high sensitivity and specific detection of foodborne pathogen. As-developed flexible NPE sensing platform could provide portability, low-cost, reliability, and disposable sensing platform to realize on-site POCT biosensors.
All authors have contributed to conducting experiments and write the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by Nano Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (No. 2017M3A7B4039936 and No. 2017M3A7B4041761). This research was also supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of Korea (No. 2018R1C1B3001553).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
All the data are presented in the submitted manuscript and no additional information is available.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- D.-K. Kang, M.M. Ali, K. Zhang, S.S. Huang, E. Peterson, M.A. Digman, E. Gratton, W. Zhao, Nat. Commun. 5, 5426 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- D. Rissin, C.W. Kan, T.G. Campbell, S.C. Howes, D.R. Fourniner, L. Song, T. Piech, P.P. Patel, L. Chang, A.J. Rivnak, E.P. Ferrel, J.D. Randall, G.K. Provuncher, D.R. Walt, D.C. Duffy, Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 595 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- H. Sharma, R. Mutharasan, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 183, 535 (2013). (foodborne pathogen review) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- A.A. Baer, M.J. Miller, A.C. Dilger, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 12, 183 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- I.-H. Cho, S. Ku, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 2078 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- M.J. Allen, S.C. Edberg, D.J. Reasoner, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 92, 265 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- D.E. Van, M. Leven, S. Pattyn, L. Van Damme, M. Laga, J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 1751 (2001)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- A.D. Taylor, Q. Yu, S. Chem, J. Homola, S. Jiang, Sens. Actuators B 107, 202 (2005)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- P. Arora, A. Sindhu, N. Dilbaghi, A. Chaudhury, Biosens. Bioelectron. 28, 1 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- V. Perumal, U. Hashim, J. Appl. Biomed. 12, 1 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Y.T. Kim, K.J. Park, S. Kim, S.A. Kim, S.J. Lee, D.H. Kim, T.J. Lee, K.G. Lee, Talanta 179, 207 (2018)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- M.H. Abdalhai, A.M. Fernandes, M. Bashari, J. Ji, Q. He, X. Sun, J. Agric, Food Chem. 62, 12659 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- J. Mehta, P. Vinayak, S.K. Tuteja, V.A. Chhabra, N. Bhardwaj, A.L. Paul, K.-H. Kim, A. Deep, Biosen. Bioelectron. 82, 339 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- W.-W. Zhan, J.-J. Xu, H.-Y. Chem, Chem. Rev. 114, 7421 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- L. Su, W. Jia, C. Hou, Y. Lei, Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 1788 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- P. Mehrotra, J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 6, 153 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- A.P.F. Turner, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 3184 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- J. Ping, R. Vishnubhotla, A. Vrudhula, A.T.C. Johnson, ACS Nano 10, 8700 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- A.S. John, C.P. Price, Clin. Biochem. Rev. 35, 155 (2014)Google Scholar
- I. Kim, J.-S. Moon, J.-W. Oh, Nano Converg. 3, 27 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- K. Yamada, K. Suzuki, D. Citterio, ACS Sens. 2, 1247 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- X. Ren, J. Yan, D. Wu, Q. Wei, Y. Wan, ACS Sens. 2, 1267 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- M. Yang, D.S. Kim, J.H. Yoon, S.B. Hong, S.W. Jeong, D.E. Yoo, T.J. Lee, S.J. Lee, K.G. Lee, B.G. Choi, Analyst 141, 1319 (2016)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- C. Shin, W. Shin, H.G. Hong, Electrochim. Acta 53, 720 (2007)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- B. Wolfrum, Y. Mourzina, D. Mayer, D. Schwabb, A. Offenhäusser, Small 2, 1256 (2006)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- J.-K. Chen, G.-Y. Zhou, C.-J. Chang, C.-C. Cheng, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 194, 10 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- K.G. Lee, B.G. Choi, B.I. Kim, T. Shyu, M.S. Oh, S.G. Im, S.-J. Chang, T.J. Lee, N.A. Kotov, S.J. Lee, Adv. Mater. 26, 6119 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- M.H. Yang, S.W. Jeong, S.J. Chang, K.H. Kim, M. Jang, C.H. Kim, N.H. Bae, G.S. Sim, T. Kang, S.J. Lee, B.G. Choi, K.G. Lee, A.C.S. Appl, Mater. Interfaces 8, 24978 (2016)Google Scholar
- J.R. Windmiller, J. Wang, Electoanalysis 25, 29 (2013)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, M. Jaroniec, Y. Jin, S.Z. Qiao, Small 8, 3550 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- C. Zhu, G. Yang, H. Li, D. Du, Y. Lin, Anal. Chem. 87, 230 (2015)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- N. Reta, C.P. Saint, A. Michelmore, B. Prieto-Simon, N.H. Voelcker, A.C.S. Appl, Mater. Interfaces 10, 6055 (2018)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- S. Cinti, G. Volpe, S. Piermarini, E. Delibato, G. Palleschi, Sensors 17, 190 (2017)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- J.M. Steijns, Int. J. Dairy Technol. 54, 81 (2001)View ArticleGoogle Scholar